full_report_info
How to buy the full sweeper report (bytecode heuristic, source verification, risk, advice) via x402. Does not pay.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
How to buy the full sweeper report (bytecode heuristic, source verification, risk, advice) via x402. Does not pay.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, and the description reinforces this with 'Does not pay.' It adds useful context about the x402 payment mechanism and the report's contents, though it does not describe the return format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short, front-loaded sentences with no wasted words. The core purpose and key constraint are stated immediately.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter informational tool with readOnlyHint already set, the description covers what the tool is and what it does not do. It could optionally mention what the informational output looks like, but the core context is present.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to clarify. Baseline 4 is appropriate given the empty input schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a clear purpose: explaining how to purchase the full sweeper report via x402, with a parenthetical list of report contents. It is specific about the resource and mechanism, though it does not need sibling differentiation since the only sibling is unrelated.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implies usage when an agent needs to know how to buy the full report, and clarifies that this tool itself does not pay. However, it does not explicitly name alternatives or state when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.