Skip to main content
Glama

List Filings

ListFilings
Read-only

List stored SEC filings and earnings-call transcripts newest first. Omit ticker for a market-wide feed or provide one ticker for a company-specific list. Returns company identity, document IDs, types, filing and reporting dates, SEC item numbers, line counts, and page totals. Supports date, document-type, and exact SEC item-number filters. Hidden document types remain excluded unless explicitly requested. Pass a returned ID to SearchDocument or ReadDocumentLines.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoPage number for pagination (default: 1)
tickerNoOptional company ticker symbol (e.g., AAPL, MSFT). Omit for all companies.
endDateNoOptional end date filter in YYYY-MM-DD format
maxItemsNoMaximum number of documents per page (default: 10)
startDateNoOptional start date filter in YYYY-MM-DD format
itemNumberNoOptional exact SEC current-report item number, e.g. 2.02, 5.02, or 1.01.
documentTypeNoDocument type filter. Accepts a registered type value — 'TenK', 'TenQ', 'EightK', 'TenKa', 'TenQa', 'EightKa', 'TwentyF', 'SixK', 'FortyF', 'TwentyFa', 'SixKa', or 'FortyFa' — or its display name (e.g. '10-K', '20-F/A'), plus any deployment-registered type, such as EarningsCallTranscript (display name: Earnings Call) for earnings-call transcripts where available. An unrecognized value returns an error listing every accepted value.

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnlyHint and destructiveHint annotations, the description reveals meaningful behavior: results are sorted newest-first, hidden document types stay excluded unless explicitly requested, and the response includes specific metadata fields. This gives the agent a strong behavioral model of the call.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact yet information-dense: every sentence conveys a distinct fact—ordering, ticker behavior, return fields, filters, hidden-type behavior, and downstream usage. Key behavioral details are front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only listing tool with no output schema, the description covers what the tool returns, how to paginate conceptually via maxItems/page, how to filter, and what to do with returned IDs. No critical information for invoking it correctly appears missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds useful context beyond parameter names by explaining the ticker omission behavior, filter categories, and the hidden-document-type exclusion rule, which clarifies how documentType behaves in practice.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('List') and resource ('stored SEC filings and earnings-call transcripts'), and clarifies ordering ('newest first') and output contents. It also distinguishes itself from downstream tools like SearchDocument and ReadDocumentLines by noting the ID-passing relationship.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear usage context: omit ticker for market-wide feed, provide one ticker for company-specific list, and chain returned IDs into SearchDocument or ReadDocumentLines. It does not explicitly contrast with SearchDocuments or other list-type siblings, so it stops just short of full alternative routing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with detailed descriptions that cross-reference related alternatives. A few near-duplicate names could cause misselection, notably SearchDocument versus SearchDocuments and GetCftcPositioning versus GetLatestCftcPositioning.

Naming Consistency5/5

Tool names consistently follow a VerbNoun camelCase pattern: Get for retrievals, Search for discovery, List/Read for document access, and Add/Close/Remove/Update/Watch/Create/Delete for portfolio mutations. Despite the large count, there is no mixing of naming conventions or unpredictable verb styles.

Tool Count1/5

108 tools is an extreme surface area, far beyond the 3-15 well-scoped range and well past the 25+ threshold. Even for a broad financial data platform, this creates a heavy selection burden and substantial context overhead for agents.

Completeness4/5

The server covers an unusually wide domain: prices, fundamentals, SEC filings, options, insider activity, 13F holdings, short interest, macro data, funds, IPOs, and full portfolio lifecycle management. Notable gaps remain, such as a basic company profile/ticker-resolution tool, dividend history, and analyst estimates, so it is not a perfect 5.