Skip to main content
Glama

Trades by Congress Member

GetMemberTrades
Read-only

Get a congress member's disclosed securities transactions (newest first, last year by default). Shows tickers, transaction and filing dates, disclosed amount ranges, and the filed Asset identifying the instrument (such as stock, option, or bond). Use SearchCongressMembers to find member names, and GetCongressionalTrades for all members' transactions in one ticker.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
offsetNoNumber of trades to skip before returning rows (default: 0, clamped to 0-100000). For the next page, add the returned row count to the clamped current offset; if the next offset exceeds 100000, narrow the filters instead. Stop when fewer than the effective page size (maxResults clamped to 1-500) are returned, or the response's total has been reached.
tickerNoOptional stock ticker to combine with the member filter (e.g., AAPL)
endDateNoEnd date in YYYY-MM-DD format (defaults to today)
startDateNoStart date in YYYY-MM-DD format (defaults to 1 year ago)
maxResultsNoMaximum number of trades to return (default: 50, max: 500, newest first)
memberNameYesCongress member name, case-insensitive (e.g., 'Nancy Pelosi', 'Dan Crenshaw'); use SearchCongressMembers to find the exact name
transactionTypeNoFilter by transaction type: Purchase or Sale; the synonyms Buy/Sell are accepted (defaults to all)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / offset / description
      Previous value: -"Number of trades to skip before returning rows — pass the previous call's shown count to page past the maxResults cap (default: 0)"New value: +"Number of trades to skip before returning rows (default: 0, clamped to 0-100000). For the next page, add the returned row count to the clamped current offset; if the next offset exceeds 100000, narrow the filters instead. Stop when fewer than the effective page size (maxResults clamped to 1-500) are returned, or the response's total has been reached."
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / ticker
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Optional stock ticker to combine with the member filter (e.g., AAPL)",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / offset
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": 0,
      +  "description": "Number of trades to skip before returning rows — pass the previous call's shown count to page past the maxResults cap (default: 0)",
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, openWorldHint=false. The description adds value beyond them by disclosing default ordering (newest first) and the default one-year window, plus the shape of returned fields. It does not mention pagination behavior, though the schema covers that.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, no filler, front-loaded with the core action and scope before the field list and sibling routing. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description carries the burden of describing return values — which it does (tickers, transaction/filing dates, amount ranges, filed asset). Combined with fully covered parameters and clear annotations, nothing needed to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all seven parameters are already documented, including offset/maxResults paging and the startDate one-year default. The description's 'last year by default' only restates the schema default, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Get a congress member's disclosed securities transactions') and pins down scope with default time window and ordering. It also enumerates the returned fields, so an agent knows exactly what comes back.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes to siblings: SearchCongressMembers for resolving member names (a prerequisite) and GetCongressionalTrades for all-members search by ticker. The distinction between member-scoped and ticker-scoped queries is unambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.