Skip to main content
Glama

Lumi Trades: x402 seller checks and test-buys

Lumi: endpoints and live prices (free)

lumi_catalog
Read-only

Free. Lists Lumi API endpoints, live prices (XRP / RLUSD / USDC on the XRP Ledger, USDC on Base, USDC on Stellar), payment settings of this MCP server and the caller wallet address.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "lumi_catalog"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so safety is covered. The description adds useful context that output includes this server's payment settings and the caller's wallet address, but says nothing about caching, freshness of 'live prices', or response shape.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence: 'Free.' first, then a tightly enumerated list of returned resources. No restatement of the name or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, so the description must describe returns itself, and it does enumerate the contents well. It falls short only on freshness and format of the 'live prices', which an agent might want before calling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero parameters, so the schema does no work and the baseline is 4. Nothing in the description misleads about inputs, and none are required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Lists) and enumerates the resources returned: endpoints, live prices across named chains, payment settings, and caller wallet address. This clearly separates it from the sibling check/quote/report tools, though it never names those siblings explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The leading 'Free.' implicitly signals this is the no-cost discovery entry point versus sibling tools, and listing endpoints implies a 'start here' role. However, it never states when to use it versus lumi_quote or lumi_high_value_check, leaving the routing to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.