Skip to main content
Glama

who-gho-mcp-server

List WHO GHO Indicators

who_list_indicators
Read-onlyIdempotent

Browse the WHO Global Health Observatory indicator catalog with pagination. Use when you want to explore indicators without a keyword, or to page through the full catalog. Use who_search_indicators when you have a keyword to narrow the results.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "who_list_indicators"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoNumber of indicators to return per page. Default 50, max 500.
offsetNoZero-based offset for pagination. Default 0.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNoPresent when the call failed. Absent on success.
noticeNoRequested and applied limit when the page was clamped.
hasMoreNoTrue when more indicators exist beyond the current page.
pageInfoNoHuman-readable page position, e.g. "offset 0, showing 50 of 3102". Use to construct the next offset.
indicatorsNoIndicators for the requested page.
totalCountNoTotal number of indicators in the GHO catalog.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / limit / maximum
      Removed value: -500
    • addedOutput schema / properties / notice
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Requested and applied limit when the page was clamped.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / pageInfo / description
      Previous value: -"Human-readable page position, e.g. \"offset 0, showing 50 of 3059\". Use to construct the next offset."New value: +"Human-readable page position, e.g. \"offset 0, showing 50 of 3102\". Use to construct the next offset."
  2. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedOutput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • addedOutput schema / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "not": {
      +      "required": [
      +        "error"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "indicators",
      +      "totalCount",
      +      "hasMore",
      +      "pageInfo"
      +    ]
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "required": [
      +      "error"
      +    ]
      +  }
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / error
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "description": "Present when the call failed. Absent on success.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "code": {
      +      "description": "JSON-RPC error code for this failure.",
      +      "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      +      "minimum": -9007199254740991,
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    "data": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "properties": {
      +        "reason": {
      +          "description": "Machine-readable failure mode.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "recovery": {
      +          "additionalProperties": {},
      +          "description": "Actionable next step for the caller.",
      +          "properties": {
      +            "hint": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "hint"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "retryable": {
      +          "description": "Whether retrying may succeed.",
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "message": {
      +      "description": "Human-readable description of what went wrong.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "code",
      +    "message"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / required
      Removed value: -[
      -  "indicators",
      -  "totalCount",
      -  "hasMore",
      -  "pageInfo"
      -]
  3. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / pageInfo
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Human-readable page position, e.g. \"offset 0, showing 50 of 3059\". Use to construct the next offset.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / total
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Total number of indicators in the GHO catalog.",
      -  "type": "number"
      -}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / totalCount
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Total number of indicators in the GHO catalog.",
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "indicators",
      -  "total",
      -  "hasMore"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "indicators",
      +  "totalCount",
      +  "hasMore",
      +  "pageInfo"
      +]
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and openWorldHint=false, so safety and idempotence are covered. The description adds that this is a paginated catalog browse, which is useful behavioral context beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose and immediately followed by usage guidance and the alternative tool. No wasted text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, parameters are fully described in the schema, and the selection alternative is named. Everything an agent needs to choose and invoke this tool correctly is present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so limit and offset are fully documented in the schema. The description mentions pagination but adds no syntax or constraint details beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: browsing the WHO Global Health Observatory indicator catalog. It also clarifies that this is the full-catalog browsing tool, which cleanly distinguishes it from keyword-based search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when to use this tool (exploring without a keyword, paging through the full catalog) and names the alternative sibling, who_search_indicators, for keyword narrowing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.