Skip to main content
Glama

usaspending-mcp-server

Spending Over Time

usaspending_spending_over_time
Read-onlyIdempotent

Fetch aggregated federal obligation amounts grouped by fiscal year, fiscal quarter, or fiscal month. All grouping is relative to the US government fiscal year (Oct–Sep), so fiscal month 1 is October, not January. Filter by award type, agency, recipient, keyword, or NAICS code to trace spending trends in a specific area. Returns per-period totals and optional breakdowns by award category (contracts, grants, direct payments, IDVs, loans, other).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
groupYesTime grouping: fiscal_year (annual US govt FY: Oct–Sep), quarter (fiscal quarter), or month (fiscal month — an ordinal within the fiscal year, where 1 = October)
filtersNoFilters to scope the time-series aggregation. Defaults to contract awards when omitted.
subawardsNoAggregate subaward data instead of prime award data

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNoPresent when the call failed. Absent on success.
groupNoTime grouping used
noticeNoNames a time-window bound that was filled in because only the other was supplied, and suggests broadening filters when no periods are returned. Absent when neither applies.
resultsNoTime-series of obligation totals
time_groupNoTime grouping applied: fiscal_year, quarter, or month
period_countNoNumber of time periods returned
total_periodsNoNumber of time periods returned
applied_keywordsNoKeyword filters applied (comma-separated)
applied_agency_nameNoAwarding agency name filter applied
applied_naics_codesNoNAICS code filters applied (comma-separated)
applied_time_period_endNoEnd of the time window sent (YYYY-MM-DD), including a filled-in end
applied_time_period_startNoStart of the time window sent (YYYY-MM-DD), including a filled-in start

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed11 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / filters / properties / time_period_end / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "const": "",
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "description": "Date as YYYY-MM-DD; month and day may be unpadded",
      +    "pattern": "^\\d{4}-\\d{1,2}-\\d{1,2}$",
      +    "type": "string"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / filters / properties / time_period_end / description
      Previous value: -"End of the time window (YYYY-MM-DD)"New value: +"End of the time window (YYYY-MM-DD). Given alone, the window starts at 2007-10-01, the earliest searchable date."
    • removedInput schema / properties / filters / properties / time_period_end / type
      Removed value: -"string"
    • addedInput schema / properties / filters / properties / time_period_start / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "const": "",
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "description": "Date as YYYY-MM-DD; month and day may be unpadded",
      +    "pattern": "^\\d{4}-\\d{1,2}-\\d{1,2}$",
      +    "type": "string"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / filters / properties / time_period_start / description
      Previous value: -"Start of the time window (YYYY-MM-DD)"New value: +"Start of the time window (YYYY-MM-DD), 2007-10-01 or later. Given alone, the window runs through today (UTC)."
    • removedInput schema / properties / filters / properties / time_period_start / type
      Removed value: -"string"
    • changedOutput schema / properties / applied_time_period_end / description
      Previous value: -"End date filter applied (YYYY-MM-DD)"New value: +"End of the time window sent (YYYY-MM-DD), including a filled-in end"
    • changedOutput schema / properties / applied_time_period_start / description
      Previous value: -"Start date filter applied (YYYY-MM-DD)"New value: +"Start of the time window sent (YYYY-MM-DD), including a filled-in start"
    • changedOutput schema / properties / error / properties / data / properties / reason / description
      Previous value: -"Machine-readable failure mode. Declared by this tool: `api_unavailable`: USAspending.gov API is unreachable or returns an error. `api_timeout`: USAspending.gov did not respond before the request deadline elapsed. Other values are possible when a failure originates below the handler."New value: +"Machine-readable failure mode. Declared by this tool: `api_unavailable`: USAspending.gov API is unreachable or returns an error. `api_timeout`: USAspending.gov did not respond before the request deadline elapsed. `date_range_inverted`: Both filters.time_period_start and filters.time_period_end were supplied and the start falls after the end. `date_before_earliest`: The resolved start date precedes the 2007-10-01 earliest date this endpoint can search. Other values are possible when a failure originates below the handler."
    • changedOutput schema / properties / error / properties / data / properties / reason / examples
      Previous value: -[
      -  "api_unavailable",
      -  "api_timeout"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "api_unavailable",
      +  "api_timeout",
      +  "date_range_inverted",
      +  "date_before_earliest"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / notice / description
      Previous value: -"Recovery hint when no periods are returned — suggests broadening filters. Absent when results are present."New value: +"Names a time-window bound that was filled in because only the other was supplied, and suggests broadening filters when no periods are returned. Absent when neither applies."
  2. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedOutput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • addedOutput schema / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "not": {
      +      "required": [
      +        "error"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "group",
      +      "results",
      +      "total_periods",
      +      "time_group",
      +      "period_count"
      +    ]
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "required": [
      +      "error"
      +    ]
      +  }
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / error
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "description": "Present when the call failed. Absent on success.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "code": {
      +      "description": "JSON-RPC error code for this failure.",
      +      "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      +      "minimum": -9007199254740991,
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    "data": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "properties": {
      +        "reason": {
      +          "description": "Machine-readable failure mode. Declared by this tool: `api_unavailable`: USAspending.gov API is unreachable or returns an error. `api_timeout`: USAspending.gov did not respond before the request deadline elapsed. Other values are possible when a failure originates below the handler.",
      +          "examples": [
      +            "api_unavailable",
      +            "api_timeout"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "recovery": {
      +          "additionalProperties": {},
      +          "description": "Actionable next step for the caller.",
      +          "properties": {
      +            "hint": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "hint"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "retryable": {
      +          "description": "Whether retrying may succeed.",
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "message": {
      +      "description": "Human-readable description of what went wrong.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "code",
      +    "message"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / required
      Removed value: -[
      -  "group",
      -  "results",
      -  "total_periods",
      -  "time_group",
      -  "period_count"
      -]
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / results / items / properties / idvs
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "IDV (Indefinite Delivery Vehicle) obligation amount in USD for this period",
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
  4. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / group / description
      Previous value: -"Time grouping: fiscal_year (annual US govt FY: Oct–Sep), quarter (fiscal quarter), or month (calendar month)"New value: +"Time grouping: fiscal_year (annual US govt FY: Oct–Sep), quarter (fiscal quarter), or month (fiscal month — an ordinal within the fiscal year, where 1 = October)"
    • changedOutput schema / properties / results / items / properties / time_period / description
      Previous value: -"Time period for this row"New value: +"Time period for this row. Populated per the requested grouping: fiscal_year alone, fiscal_year + quarter, or fiscal_year + month."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / results / items / properties / time_period / properties / calendar_year
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Calendar year",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / results / items / properties / time_period / properties / month / description
      Previous value: -"Calendar month (1–12)"New value: +"Fiscal month: an ordinal within fiscal_year, 1–12, where 1 = October and 12 = September. Fiscal month 1 of FY2025 is October 2024 — not January."
  5. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / applied_agency_name
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Awarding agency name filter applied",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / applied_keywords
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Keyword filters applied (comma-separated)",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / applied_naics_codes
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "NAICS code filters applied (comma-separated)",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / applied_time_period_end
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "End date filter applied (YYYY-MM-DD)",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / applied_time_period_start
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Start date filter applied (YYYY-MM-DD)",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  6. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / notice
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Recovery hint when no periods are returned — suggests broadening filters. Absent when results are present.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  7. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / period_count
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Number of time periods returned",
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / time_group
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Time grouping applied: fiscal_year, quarter, or month",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "group",
      -  "results",
      -  "total_periods"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "group",
      +  "results",
      +  "total_periods",
      +  "time_group",
      +  "period_count"
      +]
  8. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish read-only, idempotent, and open-world behavior, so the bar is lower. The description adds valuable behavioral context by explaining the US government fiscal-year calendar, that fiscal month 1 is October, and that results include per-period totals and optional award-category breakdowns. It does not introduce contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three dense sentences cover purpose, the critical fiscal-year nuance, filtering capabilities, and return shape without redundancy. The most important clarification (fiscal month 1 = October) is front-loaded near the primary purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a nested `filters` object and a rich output schema, the description adequately orients the agent on what the tool returns and how to scope it. The remaining details like award-type defaults, time window behavior, and subawards are fully described in the schema, so no essential decision-making context is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, including detailed explanations for `group`, `filters`, and subfields. The description reinforces the fiscal-year calendar and lists filter dimensions, but it does not add substantive parameter meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb ('Fetch aggregated federal obligation amounts'), a precise resource (time-series spending data), and distinct grouping dimensions (fiscal year/quarter/month). It clearly differentiates from siblings by emphasizing time-based aggregation rather than category or geography breakdowns.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives a clear use case: 'trace spending trends in a specific area' using temporal aggregation and filters. It does not explicitly name alternatives or state when not to use this tool, so it stops short of a 5, but the context is unambiguous enough for an agent to select it appropriately.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.