Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
An output schema exists, so return values needn't be explained, yet the description enumerates the entry fields (source tool, query params, creation/expiry, row count, completeness, column schema), which is slightly redundant but helps the agent know what it can rely on. The full describe→query workflow is covered.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.