Skip to main content
Glama

pubmed-mcp-server

by io.github.cyanheads

Pubmed Lookup Citation

pubmed_lookup_citation
Read-only

Look up PubMed IDs from partial bibliographic citations. Useful when you have a reference (journal, year, volume, page, author) and need the PMID — deterministic citation matching, more reliable than free-text search for structured references. Each citation must include at least journal or year (ECitMatch primary-keys on journal+volume+page; author-only or volume-only inputs guarantee no match); more fields = better match accuracy.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
citationsYesCitations to look up. More fields = better match accuracy.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNoPresent when the call failed. Absent on success.
resultsNoMatch results, one per input citation
totalMatchedNoNumber of citations with PMID matches
totalWarningsNoNumber of matched citations that carry at least one warning
totalSubmittedNoNumber of citations submitted

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds valuable behavioral context beyond annotations: it explains the deterministic ECitMatch primary-key behavior, the field requirements for a match, and how field completeness affects accuracy.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two dense sentences with no filler. The purpose is front-loaded, followed immediately by usage context, reliability comparison, and critical constraints. Every clause adds information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers when to use the tool, how matching works, required fields, and accuracy trade-offs. An output schema exists, so return-value documentation is not the description's burden. Nothing essential for correct invocation is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description adds meaningful semantics beyond the schema by explaining that more fields improve match accuracy and that journal+volume+page are the primary keys, which helps the agent construct effective citations.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Look up PubMed IDs from partial bibliographic citations.' It also distinguishes itself from free-text search by emphasizing deterministic citation matching for structured references, which clearly separates it from sibling tools like pubmed_search_articles.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly states when to use this tool ('when you have a reference... and need the PMID') and contrasts it with free-text search. It also gives concrete exclusion guidance: author-only or volume-only inputs guarantee no match, and each citation must include at least journal or year.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All pubmed-mcp-server toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

The tools constitute a well-designed set targeting distinct workflow steps: searching (pubmed_search_articles, pubmed_europepmc_search), fetching (pubmed_fetch_articles, pubmed_fetch_fulltext, pubmed_europepmc_fetch), ID conversion (pubmed_convert_ids), related articles (pubmed_find_related), citations (pubmed_format_citations, pubmed_lookup_citation), MeSH lookup (pubmed_lookup_mesh), and spelling (pubmed_spell_check). While search and fetch tools in PubMed vs Europe PMC overlap somewhat, the descriptions explicitly differentiate them (local PubMed vs broader Europe PMC with preprints/patents), so ambiguity is minor.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent `pubmed_` prefix followed by verb_noun pattern: `search_articles`, `fetch_articles`, `lookup_citation`, `format_citations`, `convert_ids`, `find_related`, etc. The verbs are all lowercase snake_case, and the pattern is uniform across the entire set, even for the Europe PMC variants (`pubmed_europepmc_search`, `pubmed_europepmc_fetch`).

Tool Count5/5

11 tools makes for a well-scoped server. Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose within the biomedical literature retrieval domain: searching, fetching metadata/full-text, ID conversion, citation formatting/lookup, MeSH exploration, related-articles, and spell-check. No tool feels redundant or trivial; the count is appropriate for the domain's complexity.

Completeness5/5

The tool set provides comprehensive coverage of the core PubMed/PMC workflow: search with full query syntax, fetch metadata and full text, convert identifiers across DOI/PMID/PMCID, find related articles, format citations, and explore MeSH vocabulary. Notable gaps like more advanced search history management or batch operations exist but are not essential to the domain's core purpose. The fallback logic (e.g., europepmc_fetch for non-PMC records, fulltext fallback chain) fills potential dead ends.

Resources