Skip to main content
Glama

Update Blog Post

neuron_update_blog_post
Idempotent

Update an existing blog post's content, metadata, status, or SEO fields. Only provided fields are changed.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesUnique identifier (UUID) of the blog post to update
titleNoNew title for the blog post
statusNoNew publication status for the post
contentNoNew body content in markdown format. Supports raw HTML inline via rehype-raw: images/GIFs via ![alt](url), videos via <video>, YouTube/Loom embeds via <iframe>, collapsible sections via <details>/<summary>, plus <mark>, <kbd>, <abbr>.
excerptNoNew short summary or preview text
seoTitleNoNew custom SEO title override
seoKeywordsNoNew list of SEO keywords
coverImageUrlNoNew URL for the cover image
seoDescriptionNoNew meta description for search engines

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already convey idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false. The description adds 'Only provided fields are changed' (partial update behavior) which is not in annotations, but no further behavioral context (e.g., permissions, side effects). No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no wasted words. Purpose is front-loaded. Concise and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 9-parameter update tool with full schema descriptions and no output schema, the description adequately covers the purpose and partial update behavior. Lacks return value info but acceptable given schema richness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed parameter descriptions. The description does not add meaning beyond the schema, only summarizes categories. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Update an existing blog post' specifying the verb and resource, and lists categories of fields. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'publish_blog_post' for status changes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., 'publish_blog_post' for publishing, 'create_blog_post' for new posts). The note 'Only provided fields are changed' implies partial update but lacks exclusions or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

Most tools are clearly separated by resource type, but there is meaningful overlap in messaging entry points (send_message, send_whatsapp, compose_message, bot_api_send) and contact ingestion/sync tools (import_contacts, populate_contacts, sync_whatsapp_contacts). The descriptions help disambiguate, but with 309 tools an agent will frequently need to read closely to pick the right one.

Naming Consistency4/5

The overwhelming majority of tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: create_*, get_*, list_*, update_*, delete_*. Minor deviations like sales_stats, lead_stats, wallet_balance, and whoami break the pattern slightly, but overall naming is highly predictable.

Tool Count1/5

309 tools is an extreme count for any MCP server, even a broad platform. This creates significant cognitive load and navigation overhead for agents, and far exceeds the well-scoped 3-15 tool range where coherence is strongest.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface is remarkably comprehensive across bots, contacts, campaigns, flows, knowledge bases, personas, marketplace, wallet, and products. Minor gaps exist — lead sources lack update/delete tools, and there is no single get_task or get_webhook alongside their list/update/delete counterparts — but these are workable gaps rather than dead ends.

Resources