Get Blocklist
neuron_get_blocklistFetch the list of all blocked WhatsApp contacts for the bot on the given channel.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| channelId | Yes | WhatsApp channel identifier (UUID) |
neuron_get_blocklistFetch the list of all blocked WhatsApp contacts for the bot on the given channel.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| channelId | Yes | WhatsApp channel identifier (UUID) |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, non-destructive behavior. Description adds scope ('for the bot on the given channel') but does not disclose response format or pagination, which could be gaps.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, 17 words, front-loaded with verb and object. No redundant information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity and annotations, the description is adequate for a retrieve operation. However, missing output schema means the agent may need to infer the structure of the returned list.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter fully described. The description adds minimal meaning beyond 'channelId' being a UUID for the WhatsApp channel.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses specific verb 'Fetch' and resource 'blocklist', clearly indicating it retrieves blocked WhatsApp contacts. It differentiates from sibling tools like neuron_block_contact and neuron_unblock_contact.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies use when needing to view blocked contacts, but lacks explicit guidance on when not to use or alternatives. No contrast with related tools like neuron_list_whatsapp_contacts.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.