Delete Contact
neuron_delete_contactPermanently delete a contact and remove them from all contact lists. This action cannot be undone.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Unique identifier (UUID) of the contact to delete |
neuron_delete_contactPermanently delete a contact and remove them from all contact lists. This action cannot be undone.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Unique identifier (UUID) of the contact to delete |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Description adds context beyond annotations: 'permanent' and 'cannot be undone', and 'removes from all contact lists'. Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true, so the description reinforces without contradicting.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short, front-loaded sentences with no unnecessary words. Every sentence provides key information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple deletion operation with one parameter and no output schema, the description adequately covers all needed context: action, scope, and irreversibility.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a clear description for the 'id' parameter. Description does not add additional semantic value beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'delete', the resource 'contact', and scope 'removes from all contact lists'. Distinguishes from siblings like neuron_block_contact and neuron_remove_from_contact_list.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implies severity ('cannot be undone') but does not explicitly state when to use vs alternatives such as blocking or removing from a list. No exclusions or alternative tool names mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.