Bulk download metadata + images from Alexandria Aeternum (min 100 artworks). ($5.00 / 50 GCX)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| offset | No | Start offset for pagination | |
| quantity | No | Number of artworks (min 100) | |
| dataset_id | No | Dataset ID | alexandria-aeternum |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description adds cost information ($5.00 / 50 GCX) beyond the annotations, which already declare read-only and non-destructive behavior. There is no contradiction with annotations. However, additional behavioral details like expected output format or rate limits are missing.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise, using a single sentence to convey the core function, scope, and pricing. No unnecessary words, and key information is front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
While the description covers purpose and cost, it lacks details about the return format (e.g., whether it returns a zip file or individual assets), pagination behavior, or what metadata fields are included. Given no output schema, these gaps reduce completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage, so the description does not need to add parameter details. It reiterates the minimum quantity but does not provide new semantic context beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's function: bulk download metadata and images from a specific dataset (Alexandria Aeternum). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools by emphasizing the bulk nature and minimum quantity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for bulk downloads with minimum 100 artworks but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention when not to use it. No exclusion criteria or sibling tool comparisons are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool targets a distinct operation—artwork retrieval, image processing, asset management, watermarking, etc.—with clear descriptions that prevent confusion. Even similar tools like enrich_metadata and get_artwork_oracle are differentiated by depth and purpose.
Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., get_artwork, remove_background, register_hash). The few non-verb-starting names (compliance_manifest) are standard and do not break the overall pattern.
27 tools is slightly above the typical range but justifiable given the broad domain covering artwork access, image processing, and digital rights. Each tool serves a unique purpose without redundancy.
The tool set covers the full lifecycle: search, retrieve, analyze, edit, save, and verify assets. Gaps are minimal—e.g., no metadata deletion tool—but the core workflows are fully supported, and the inclusion of compliance and provenance tools adds value.