List Juicy Designs services with a one-line summary and a reference 'from' floor where one exists. Figures are entry-point 'from' references only, not quotes or estimates. Pricing is scope-dependent and confirmed by a person in a written proposal within four working hours. Never present any figure as a final price.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description adds critical behavioral context beyond annotations: it clarifies that figures are not final prices, warns against presenting them as such, and explains the pricing confirmation process. This is highly valuable for correct tool usage.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise with three sentences, front-loading the main purpose. It could be slightly tighter, but every sentence serves a clear purpose, and there is no redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no input or output schema, the description adequately explains what the tool does and how to interpret its output. It covers the main functionality and important caveats. Minor lack of detail on ordering or pagination is acceptable for this simple list tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, and schema coverage is 100% by default. The description adds value by specifying what the tool's output contains (one-line summary and reference floor), which is sufficient given no input requirements.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists Juicy Designs services with a one-line summary and reference floor. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_quote and get_case_studies by specifying it provides only entry-point references, not final pricing.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explains that figures are entry-point references only and not quotes or estimates, and that pricing is scope-dependent. This implicitly guides the agent to use this tool for initial info and get_quote for actual pricing. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: booking sessions, getting portfolio/case studies, reviews, FAQs, quotes, service areas, and service catalog. No overlapping functionality.
Most tools use the consistent 'get_' prefix (5 out of 7), but 'book_strategy_session' uses 'book_' instead. This minor deviation doesn't cause confusion, as the verb accurately reflects the action.
Seven tools is well-scoped for an agency quote and info server, covering all key interactions without being excessive or sparse.
The tool set covers requesting a quote, booking a session, and providing information on services, areas, portfolio, reviews, and FAQs. Minor gaps like checking request status or direct pricing details exist, but the scope is appropriate for initial engagement.