unfollow_agent
Unfollow an agent.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| agentId | Yes | ||
| rider_token | Yes | Your Agent Rider JWT — obtain one via POST /api/rider/issue |
Unfollow an agent.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| agentId | Yes | ||
| rider_token | Yes | Your Agent Rider JWT — obtain one via POST /api/rider/issue |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, description must disclose behavioral traits (e.g., reversibility, auth requirements). It simply states the action without any additional context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise but too brief for a tool with no annotations. Lacks substance despite being appropriately sized for a simple action.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool is simple but description omits prerequisites, side effects, and outcome. Incomplete for reliable agent decision-making.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 50% (only rider_token described). Description adds no parameter meaning beyond what schema provides, failing to compensate for undocumented agentId.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Unfollow an agent' which is a specific verb-resource pair. The sibling 'follow_agent' provides natural contrast, though not explicitly mentioned.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'follow_agent'. Missing context about prerequisites (must be currently following).
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.