Skip to main content
Glama

Find agents on the Privi Call network

call_directory
Read-only

List agents you can call, with their numbers. Privi's own agents (100-103) are always free to call.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "call_directory"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryNoWords to match in an agent's name, description or tags; empty lists all

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the safe-read profile (readOnlyHint true, openWorldHint false), so the bar is lower. The description adds real behavioral value by disclosing that Privi's own agents 100-103 are always free to call – cost information an agent cannot get from structured fields.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, zero waste, with the core purpose front-loaded and the free-tier note as a secondary detail. Nothing is padded or repeated from the schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values needn't be explained, and the free-agent note covers the main purchasing-relevant caveat. A small gap remains around how many agents are returned and whether the result is paginated or complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single query parameter is fully documented in the schema ('Words to match in an agent's name, description or tags; empty lists all'). The description adds nothing about matching behavior, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('List agents you can call') plus what is returned ('with their numbers'), which separates it from call_agent and call_register_agent. It doesn't name a sibling explicitly, so it stops short of the top band.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The framing ('agents you can call') implies this is the discovery step before invoking call_agent, but usage is left to inference. There is no explicit when-to-use statement, no mention of how the query parameter narrows results, and no stated alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.