Skip to main content
Glama

Find real work nearby

find_work
Read-onlyIdempotent

Search Vealth's public board of real ecological and community work packets. Each result includes the pay, the skill level, the exact proof that gets it approved, and a page URL. Free, no account, no wallet. Use this when someone asks for work, a job, a task, or something to do near a place. Cost and signer: free and keyless, nothing to sign.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
flagNoOne posting flag, exact match, e.g. vsh_eligible — the packets that carry Regen Network proposal 77's terms (accepted hours pay REGEN, never a USD conversion). Omit for every flag.
nearNoA place in plain words: a city, neighborhood, address, or ZIP, e.g. 'Los Angeles, CA' or '90036'. Use this when the person names a place instead of giving coordinates, which is almost always. The board finds the place from the open jobs whose address names every word (so 'Los Angeles' never matches 'Los Fresnos'), then returns the jobs around it, nearest first.
pageNoPage number, starting at 1. The reply says when more pages exist.
limitNoMax results per page, 1-25. Default 10.
queryNoFree text, e.g. 'storm drain' or 'tree planting'. Typo-tolerant.
fundedNotrue = only packets a verified payment already backs (money truth; a funded packet can still be earned_credit and never promise cash — read payModel); false = only unfunded packets, where approved proof records earned credit rather than cash unless later funded. Omit for both.
remoteNotrue = only work doable from anywhere (digital/self-verifying — what an agent with no field presence can complete); false = only placed field work. Omit for both.
latitudeNoCenter of the search. Only if you already have real coordinates.
radiusKmNoSearch radius in km, used with latitude/longitude. Default 50.
longitudeNoCenter of the search. Only if you already have real coordinates.
skillLevelNoUse 'entry' for someone starting today.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okNo
toolNo
fundedNo
payUsdNo
workIdNo
claimIdNo
claimableNo
next_callNo
proofRuleNo
fulfillableByNo
definitionOfDoneNo
needs_from_callerNo
notClaimableReasonNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / near / description
      Previous value: -"A place in plain words: a city, neighborhood, address, or ZIP, e.g. 'Los Angeles, CA' or '90036'. Use this when the person names a place instead of giving coordinates, which is almost always. Every word must appear in the packet's address, so 'Los Angeles' will not match 'Los Fresnos'."New value: +"A place in plain words: a city, neighborhood, address, or ZIP, e.g. 'Los Angeles, CA' or '90036'. Use this when the person names a place instead of giving coordinates, which is almost always. The board finds the place from the open jobs whose address names every word (so 'Los Angeles' never matches 'Los Fresnos'), then returns the jobs around it, nearest first."
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / flag
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "One posting flag, exact match, e.g. vsh_eligible — the packets that carry Regen Network proposal 77's terms (accepted hours pay REGEN, never a USD conversion). Omit for every flag.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / funded / description
      Previous value: -"true = only packets a verified payment already backs (cash on approved proof); false = only unfunded (credit-or-mint) packets. Omit for both."New value: +"true = only packets a verified payment already backs (money truth; a funded packet can still be earned_credit and never promise cash — read payModel); false = only unfunded packets, where approved proof records earned credit rather than cash unless later funded. Omit for both."
  4. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / claimable
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / notClaimableReason
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "claimId": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "definitionOfDone": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "object",
      +        "array",
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "fulfillableBy": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "funded": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "needs_from_caller": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "next_call": {
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "payUsd": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "proofRule": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "tool": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "workId": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  6. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / funded
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "true = only packets a verified payment already backs (cash on approved proof); false = only unfunded (credit-or-mint) packets. Omit for both.",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Previous value: -"Max results, 1-25. Default 10."New value: +"Max results per page, 1-25. Default 10."
    • addedInput schema / properties / page
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Page number, starting at 1. The reply says when more pages exist.",
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / remote
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "true = only work doable from anywhere (digital/self-verifying — what an agent with no field presence can complete); false = only placed field work. Omit for both.",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  7. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / latitude / description
      Previous value: -"Center of the search."New value: +"Center of the search. Only if you already have real coordinates."
    • changedInput schema / properties / longitude / description
      Previous value: -"Center of the search."New value: +"Center of the search. Only if you already have real coordinates."
    • addedInput schema / properties / near
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "A place in plain words: a city, neighborhood, address, or ZIP, e.g. 'Los Angeles, CA' or '90036'. Use this when the person names a place instead of giving coordinates, which is almost always. Every word must appear in the packet's address, so 'Los Angeles' will not match 'Los Fresnos'.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / properties / radiusKm / description
      Previous value: -"Search radius in km. Default 50."New value: +"Search radius in km, used with latitude/longitude. Default 50."
  8. First observed

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive and open-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely useful context beyond that: free, no account, no wallet, nothing to sign, plus a preview of what each result carries. It does not discuss pagination limits or result ordering in prose, leaving that to the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four short sentences, front-loaded with purpose and then trigger and cost. Minor redundancy between 'Free, no account, no wallet' and 'Cost and signer: free and keyless, nothing to sign' costs it a point.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 11 optional parameters, an output schema, and rich annotations, the description supplies purpose, trigger, cost/auth model and result preview, which is enough for correct invocation. Fine-grained search semantics are fully handled by the schema, so nothing critical is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and every parameter is described in detail there, including the near-vs-coordinates distinction and the funded/payModel caveat. The description adds no parameter-level meaning of its own beyond the phrase 'near a place,' so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (search) and resource (Vealth's public board of ecological and community work packets), and previews the result shape (pay, skill level, proof, page URL). It does not name a sibling to contrast with, so an agent must infer that this is the discovery entry point versus get_work_packet or my_work.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The trigger is explicit: 'Use this when someone asks for work, a job, a task, or something to do near a place,' covering both the intent and the place-based framing. No exclusions or named alternatives are given, so it stops short of full routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources