Skip to main content
Glama

Recent SEC filings with links ($0.003)

stock_filings
Read-only

PAID $0.003 USDC. Use when an agent asks what a company filed recently or wants the latest 10-K/10-Q/8-K link. Optional form filter (comma list) and limit.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "ticker": "<ticker>"
    },
    "name": "stock_filings"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
formNo
limitNo
tickerYes
api_keyNoOptional prepaid key (sk_scrapling_...) or catalog pass token (sdp_..., from pass_day/pass_month). Otherwise pay per call with x402 via _meta['x402/payment'].

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / api_key / description
      Previous value: -"Optional prepaid key (sk_scrapling_...). Otherwise pay per call with x402 via _meta['x402/payment']."New value: +"Optional prepaid key (sk_scrapling_...) or catalog pass token (sdp_..., from pass_day/pass_month). Otherwise pay per call with x402 via _meta['x402/payment']."
  2. Added

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, so the safety profile is handled. The description adds genuinely non-redundant context: the call costs $0.003 USDC, which is material to whether an agent invokes it. It stops short of stating pagination, result caps, or whether payment failure is surfaced.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences with the price first, the trigger second, and the parameter notes last. No filler, and the cost – the most decision-relevant fact – is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description carries some burden for return shape; 'with links' hints at the structure but does not say what fields accompany a filing (date, accession number, form type). Payment and auth are handled via the api_key schema description, which saves it, but return-value and limit semantics remain thin.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 25%, so the schema does not carry ticker, form, or limit. The description partially compensates, telling the agent form takes a comma list and limit exists, but it never defines limit's default or maximum, nor the expected ticker format. This is partial rather than adequate compensation for the coverage gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Names a specific resource and outcome: recent SEC filings for a company, with a link per filing, calling out 10-K/10-Q/8-K. It is distinguishable from siblings like stock_price or stock_fundamentals by scope, but it never explicitly contrasts with those siblings, leaving the agent to infer that filings differ from fundamentals.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit trigger condition: 'Use when an agent asks what a company filed recently or wants the latest 10-K/10-Q/8-K link.' That is concrete usage context with no exclusions or named alternatives, which keeps it short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.