Skip to main content
Glama

Pendle PT fixed APY ($0.01)

pendle_fixed
Read-only

PAID $0.01 USDC. Implied fixed APY, expiry, days left and PT price for every active Pendle market on Ethereum, Arbitrum and Base, read on-chain. Filter by chain, q (symbol search), min_days.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "pendle_fixed"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qNo
chainNo
api_keyNoOptional prepaid key (sk_scrapling_...) or catalog pass token (sdp_..., from pass_day/pass_month). Otherwise pay per call with x402 via _meta['x402/payment'].
min_daysNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / api_key / description
      Previous value: -"Optional prepaid key (sk_scrapling_...). Otherwise pay per call with x402 via _meta['x402/payment']."New value: +"Optional prepaid key (sk_scrapling_...) or catalog pass token (sdp_..., from pass_day/pass_month). Otherwise pay per call with x402 via _meta['x402/payment']."
  2. Added

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false, so safety is covered. The description adds genuine value beyond annotations by disclosing the $0.01 USDC cost and that data is read on-chain, which are behavioral traits not in structured fields; it doesn't cover rate limits or empty-result behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Compact, front-loads the cost disclosure, then the returned fields, then filters. Every sentence earns its place with little waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, but the description enumerates the returned fields (APY, expiry, days left, PT price) which stands in for a return spec, and payment mechanics live in the api_key schema description. Enough for an agent to call it correctly, barring chain validation detail.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 25% (only api_key documented), so the description must compensate. It does add meaning for q (symbol search) and min_days, but chain is listed with no valid values/examples and the schema has no enums, leaving chain semantics ambiguous.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource (Pendle PT fixed APY, expiry, days left, PT price across active markets on three named chains) and a concrete verb (read on-chain). It's clearly differentiated from generic yield siblings by naming Pendle specifically, though it doesn't explicitly contrast with lookup_yields or staking_yields.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the filter list (chain, q, min_days), giving an agent a sense of when it's the right tool, but there is no explicit when-to-use/when-not guidance and no named alternative for related yield queries.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.