Skip to main content
Glama

Top 3 trending meme coins per chain (free, delayed)

free_meme_trending
Read-only

FREE. Use when an agent asks what meme coins are trending on Base, BNB Chain or Solana pump.fun. Top 3 per chain, 30-min delay. meme_trending ($0.005) is live with risk verdicts.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "free_meme_trending"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false, but the description adds useful behavioral context: the tool is free, returns only the top 3 per chain, and has a 30-minute delay. It does not cover rate limits or exact return fields, but adds meaningful value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded: free status, use case, coverage, delay, and paid alternative all appear in four short sentences. Every sentence serves routing or expectation-setting.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no parameters and no output schema, the description tells an agent what the tool returns at a high level (top 3 per chain) and its delay. It could specify the exact fields returned, but it is complete enough to call correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so there is no parameter semantics to document. The baseline score for a no-parameter tool is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific resource and scope: top 3 trending meme coins per chain for Base, BNB Chain, and Solana pump.fun. It also distinguishes this free delayed tool from the paid live meme_trending sibling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives an explicit trigger ('Use when an agent asks what meme coins are trending...') and identifies the alternative meme_trending for live data with risk verdicts, letting an agent route correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.