Skip to main content
Glama

List anchored discussions

swarm_list_conversation_anchors
Read-onlyIdempotent

Read resource links in a thread from swarm_get_conversation. Use swarm_list_conversation_entries for text. Neither is changed.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "thread_id": "<thread_id>"
    },
    "name": "swarm_list_conversation_anchors"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoPage size; follow next_cursor for more.
cursorNoPrevious next_cursor; keep filters and order.
thread_idYesThread ID from swarm_get_conversation.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / cursor / description
      Previous value: -"Previous next_cursor; same filters and order."New value: +"Previous next_cursor; keep filters and order."
    • changedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Previous value: -"Page size."New value: +"Page size; follow next_cursor for more."
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / cursor / description
      Added value: +"Previous next_cursor; same filters and order."
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Added value: +"Page size."
    • addedInput schema / properties / thread_id / description
      Added value: +"Thread ID from swarm_get_conversation."
  3. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the non-mutating nature is fully covered. 'Neither is changed' reinforces that but adds no behavior beyond the annotations, and pagination or scoping details are left to the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the content scope and immediately followed by the sibling routing rule. There is no filler or repetition beyond a brief non-mutation confirmation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With rich annotations, full schema coverage, and an output schema, the description gives enough context to select and call the tool. It does not describe pagination or output shape, but those are covered by the schema and output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all three parameters are already documented. The description adds only that thread_id comes from swarm_get_conversation, which is a small contextual note, not substantial parameter interpretation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific read operation on resource links within a thread, and explicitly distinguishes that content from the text returned by swarm_list_conversation_entries. The term 'anchors' is clarified by 'resource links', so an agent can identify the resource without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Clearly directs the agent to use this tool for links and names the sibling for text, which is a useful routing rule. It does not state explicit exclusions or prerequisites beyond the thread source, but the alternative is named.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.