Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds real semantics on top: it constrains what q actually searches (bill titles, only the 250 most recently updated bills), gives a concrete bill identifier format, and notes that a bill lookup returns cosponsor count, committees and up to 30 actions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.