Get vendor trust score (AgentTrust)
get_trust_scoreReturns Halverson IQ's AgentTrust reputation score plus operational summary.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
get_trust_scoreReturns Halverson IQ's AgentTrust reputation score plus operational summary.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and description only states what is returned. No mention of side effects, auth needs, or rate limits. For a retrieval tool, at minimum should indicate read-only behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence clearly communicates purpose with no unnecessary information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Low complexity tool (0 params, no output schema). Description is functional but lacks detail on 'operational summary' format. Could be more informative.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, so baseline is 4. Description adds nothing about parameters, but none exist.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it returns a trust score and operational summary. No sibling tool overlaps in function.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use or not use this tool, nor alternatives mentioned. With 13 sibling tools, some context would be beneficial.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.