Skip to main content
Glama

mcp-archimedes

by io.github.archimedes-market

get_bounty_details

Fetch the full record for a specific Archimedes Market bounty. Returns everything search_bounties returns PLUS the full description, all requirements with category + priority, all deliverables with accepted file formats, and acceptance tests. Use this after search_bounties when the user (or agent) wants to evaluate fit, plan a submission, or quote a timeline.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesBounty UUID from search_bounties results (the `id` field). Display IDs like "MSN-00001" are not accepted — use the UUID.

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It describes what the tool returns but does not disclose behavioral traits like idempotency, side effects (none expected), authentication requirements, or rate limits. The name implies read-only, but this is not explicitly stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences: first defines purpose, second gives usage context and return value highlights. No redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description adequately lists the categories of returned data. It also fits well with sibling tool search_bounties. Could mention ordering or pagination if applicable, but those likely don't apply here.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The id parameter has a detailed description explaining it requires the UUID from search_bounties (not display ID), which adds significant value beyond the schema's basic format and required tag. Schema coverage is 100%, but the description goes further.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool fetches the full record for a specific bounty, and distinguishes it from search_bounties by listing additional fields returned (description, requirements, deliverables, acceptance tests). The verb 'Fetch' and resource 'bounty' are specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states 'Use this after search_bounties' and gives three concrete scenarios (evaluate fit, plan submission, quote timeline). Could be improved by explicitly mentioning when not to use (e.g., if only metadata is needed).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All mcp-archimedes toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: check_dependencies for batch dependency trust, check_repo_trust for detailed single-repo trust, search_trust_reports for discovering trusted repos, search_bounties for finding bounties, get_bounty_details for bounty specifics, and get_platform_stats for aggregate metrics. No overlap.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (check_dependencies, check_repo_trust, get_bounty_details, get_platform_stats, search_bounties, search_trust_reports). The pattern is predictable and unambiguous.

Tool Count5/5

Six tools is well-scoped for the server's dual focus on trust checking (3 tools) and bounty marketplace (2 tools), plus one for platform stats. Each tool earns its place without overwhelming the agent.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers the core workflows: batch and single-repo trust checks with search capability, bounty discovery and details, and platform stats. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to initiate a scan for unscanned entries, but the descriptions provide URLs for that, so agents can work around it.

Resources