Skip to main content
Glama

Youfiliate Smart Links

youfiliate_list_smart_links

Read-onlyIdempotent

List your smart links with optional filtering, search, and pagination.

    Returns a paginated list of smart links. Use filters to narrow results.
    Does NOT create or modify any links.

    Args:
        params: Filters include health_status, search (title/URL), ordering,
                limit (1-100, default 20), and offset.

    Common errors:
    - No links found: you may not have created any links yet.
    

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
paramsYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and non-destructive behavior. The description adds explicit confirmation that it does not create or modify links, and it notes a common error when no links exist. This provides useful behavioral context beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description contains redundancy, such as 'List your smart links' and 'Returns a paginated list of smart links,' which adds little value. It is otherwise structured with clear sections for arguments and common errors, but could be more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that an output schema exists, the description does not need to explain return values. It covers pagination, filters, non-mutation behavior, and common errors. The only notable omission is response_format, but overall it is sufficiently complete for correct tool selection and invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The top-level schema provides no description for the single 'params' object, but the description compensates by listing health_status, search, ordering, limit, and offset with basic semantics and ranges. It omits response_format, which is a minor gap. Overall, it adds significant meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists smart links with optional filtering, search, and pagination. It explicitly notes it does not create or modify links, distinguishing it from sibling mutation tools. The verb 'List' and resource 'smart links' are unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides some usage context, such as using filters to narrow results and stating non-mutation, but it does not explicitly mention when to prefer this tool over alternatives like get_smart_link. Usage is implied rather than directly prescribed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource or action, from smart link CRUD to health checks, statistics, and YouTube migration lifecycle. There is no meaningful overlap; even similar-sounding tools like get_smart_link and get_smart_link_stats are clearly separated by configuration vs. detailed analytics.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with a uniform 'youfiliate_' prefix, e.g., create_smart_link, get_smart_link, delete_smart_link, and start_migration. No mixed conventions or exceptions are present.

Tool Count4/5

With 18 tools, the set is slightly larger than the ideal 3-15 range but remains well-scoped for the dual domain of smart link management and YouTube migration. Each tool has a clear purpose, and the count is not excessive given the feature coverage.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the full smart link lifecycle (create, read, update, delete, list) plus advanced features like health checks, aggregate/per-link stats, and preferences. The YouTube migration workflow is also complete with connect/disconnect, status, preview, start, list, status, and rollback, leaving no obvious dead ends.