Ping
pingConnectivity check — returns server version and current timestamp. Use to verify MCP server is reachable before calling other tools.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
pingConnectivity check — returns server version and current timestamp. Use to verify MCP server is reachable before calling other tools.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, but the description fully discloses the tool's behavior: a read-only connectivity check returning server info. No hidden traits needed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences: first states purpose and output, second provides usage directive. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With zero parameters and simple return, the description fully covers what the tool does and when to use it. No gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters, so baseline 4. Description doesn't need to add param info beyond schema coverage (100%).
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it's a connectivity check that returns server version and timestamp, effectively distinguishing it from sibling tools that retrieve specific data (get_company_profile, get_kakao_consult_link).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly says 'Use to verify MCP server is reachable before calling other tools,' providing clear when-to-use guidance without needing alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.