Skip to main content
Glama

trident

by io.github.alexeibespalov

open_document

Read-only

Opens a live Trident document and returns its full contents as Trident markup DSL — the human-readable text format used to author diagrams. Use this to READ and UNDERSTAND the diagram: its structure, labels, connections, and layout. Do NOT rely on this to enumerate entity IDs for programmatic use — the DSL can be very large and the output may be truncated. To get a complete, structured list of all entity IDs and counts, use get_document_summary instead. Requires a valid access token.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tokenYesAccess token for this document. The document ID is embedded in the token.
agentIdNoYOUR AI assistant name (e.g. "Claude.ai", "GitHub Copilot"). Shown as "[agentId] working with [userName]" in the collaboration presence dot.
userNameNoFirst name of the human you are assisting (ask them at session start if you do not know). Shown in the collaboration presence dot as "[agentId] working with [userName]".

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, so the bar is lower. The description adds valuable behavioral context: the returned DSL 'can be very large' and output 'may be truncated,' which is a significant caveat for the agent. It also uses 'live' to indicate dynamic content, reinforcing openWorldHint without contradicting annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded: the first sentence immediately states the core function, the second clarifies intended use, and the third adds a critical caveat and alternative. Every sentence earns its place without redundancy or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description fully characterizes the return value (Trident DSL, contents) and important constraints (large/truncated, live). It also covers the main usage distinction and access requirement. Given the tool's simplicity and strong schema/annotation support, the description is complete for an agent to decide and invoke correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for all three parameters, so the schema does the heavy lifting. The description adds no new parameter-level details beyond saying a 'valid access token' is required, which is already implied by the schema description. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb+resource: 'Opens a live Trident document and returns its full contents as Trident markup DSL.' It clearly distinguishes the tool from siblings by contrasting with get_document_summary and framing this as the 'READ and UNDERSTAND' tool, not for enumerating IDs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells when to use this tool ('to READ and UNDERSTAND the diagram') and when not to ('Do NOT rely on this to enumerate entity IDs'), and points to a specific alternative (get_document_summary). It also emphasizes the requirement for a valid access token, giving clear usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All trident toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: CRUD operations for nodes, containers, connections, and annotations are separated, and read-only/utility tools like open_document, get_document_summary, and explain are well-differentiated. No two tools have overlapping functionality.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g. add_node, delete_connection, get_document_summary). Even utility tools like open_document and validate_trident adhere to this pattern, making the set predictable and easy to navigate.

Tool Count4/5

With 22 tools, the server is slightly above the typical well-scoped range (3-15). Each tool serves a specific purpose, covering CRUD for diagram elements, multiple read operations, and collaboration features, but the count feels a bit heavy for a focused diagramming tool.

Completeness4/5

The tool set provides comprehensive CRUD for core elements (nodes, containers, connections, annotations), multiple read methods, guides, and collaboration aids. Minor gaps exist: no bulk operations, no tool to create or manage documents themselves, but the core editing workflow is well-covered.

Resources