Skip to main content
Glama

add_node

Adds a new node (entity) to a live Trident document. The node appears immediately for all collaborators. Requires a valid editor access token. Before adding nodes: call open_document to understand the diagram layout and pick sensible positions; call get_document_summary to get all existing entity IDs so you can avoid duplicates. IMPORTANT: if this node belongs inside a container, pass node.container on THIS call — do NOT create the node without a container and reparent it later via update_node. Orphaned nodes appear immediately to all live collaborators and create unnecessary visual churn.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nodeYesNode definition
tokenYesEditor access token for this document. The document ID is embedded in the token.
agentIdYesYOUR AI assistant name (e.g. "Claude.ai", "GitHub Copilot"). Shown as "[agentId] working with [userName]" in the collaboration presence dot.
userNameNoFirst name of the human you are assisting (ask them at session start if you do not know). Shown in the collaboration presence dot as "[agentId] working with [userName]".
action_explanationNoOptional: brief explanation of what this action does and why (max 250 chars). Shown live to human collaborators in the AI cursor tooltip.

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description reveals behavior beyond annotations: nodes appear immediately for all collaborators, a valid editor access token is required, and orphaned nodes create visual churn. This adds context about side effects that annotations alone (readOnlyHint=false, openWorldHint=true) do not convey. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is longer than average but every sentence carries essential operational guidance: action, live visibility, auth requirement, prerequisite calls, the container warning, and the orphaned-node consequence. It is front-loaded with the core purpose and then proceeds to actionable guidance without fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutating tool with a nested node object and no output schema, the description covers prerequisites, auth, side effects, and critical parameter timing. It does not need to explain return values since no output schema exists. The tool is well-contextualized within the sibling toolset.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds valuable parameter-level guidance beyond schema, such as 'Set this NOW if you know the parent — do not create the node orphaned', and 'Set on THIS call — do not add the node and recolor it later'. This enriches parameter semantics, but some parameter details (like icon or shapeType) are not further elaborated, so a 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Adds a new node (entity) to a live Trident document' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like add_connection and add_container, and includes immediate effects ('node appears immediately for all collaborators').

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs when to use this tool: call open_document and get_document_summary before adding nodes, and provides a strong when-not-to-use warning about creating orphaned nodes and reparenting later via update_node. It also gives clear guidance about setting container and color on this call instead of updating later.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: CRUD operations for nodes, containers, connections, and annotations are separated, and read-only/utility tools like open_document, get_document_summary, and explain are well-differentiated. No two tools have overlapping functionality.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g. add_node, delete_connection, get_document_summary). Even utility tools like open_document and validate_trident adhere to this pattern, making the set predictable and easy to navigate.

Tool Count4/5

With 22 tools, the server is slightly above the typical well-scoped range (3-15). Each tool serves a specific purpose, covering CRUD for diagram elements, multiple read operations, and collaboration features, but the count feels a bit heavy for a focused diagramming tool.

Completeness4/5

The tool set provides comprehensive CRUD for core elements (nodes, containers, connections, annotations), multiple read methods, guides, and collaboration aids. Minor gaps exist: no bulk operations, no tool to create or manage documents themselves, but the core editing workflow is well-covered.