Astro Agents - deterministic Western + Vedic astrology

Doshas

doshas

Read-onlyIdempotent

Vedic astrology doshas: check Manglik (Kuja), Kaal Sarp and Sade Sati / Dhaiya, each with the rule applied and the relevant dates. Manglik from lagna, Moon and Venus with severity and commonly cited cancellations; Kaal Sarp with type and direction (partial cases flagged); Sade Sati cycles and Dhaiya phases with start/end dates over 100 years, plus the status on a given date. Deterministic (JPL DE440, no LLM); every result carries meta.result_sha256. Price $0.15 per call via REST POST https://astro-agent.dev/v1/vedic/doshas (x402 or MPP); your first 3 calls are free here.

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`date`	No	YYYY-MM-DD (use with 'time' instead of 'datetime').
`time`	No	HH:MM or HH:MM:SS, 24 h. Omit if unknown (computed at 12:00 with a TIME_UNKNOWN warning).
`on_date`	No	YYYY-MM-DD (UTC): also report what is active on this date.
`options`	No	Optional calculation settings; every default is the common Parashari convention.
`datetime`	No	Local birth date-time, ISO 8601: '1990-05-15T14:30' (local clock time at the place) or with an explicit offset '1990-05-15T14:30:00+02:00'. Alternative: 'date' + 'time'.
`latitude`	Yes	Decimal degrees, north positive.
`timezone`	No	IANA zone, e.g. 'Asia/Kolkata'. Optional: resolved from the coordinates, with the historical offset (DST, Local Mean Time) of that date.
`longitude`	Yes	Decimal degrees, east positive.
`time_basis`	No	What the given clock time is: civil wall-clock (default), UTC, Local Mean Time, or true (apparent) solar time.	civil
`ambiguous_time`	No	Which occurrence to use when a local time happens twice (DST fall-back).	earlier

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description
`meta`	Yes	Provenance of the result.
`result`	Yes	The calculation result.
`endpoint`	Yes	The REST route that computed it, e.g. 'western/natal'.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedOct 6, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "properties": {
+    "endpoint": {
+      "description": "The REST route that computed it, e.g. 'western/natal'.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "meta": {
+      "description": "Provenance of the result.",
+      "properties": {
+        "astronomy_library": {
+          "description": "Astronomy library and version.",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "compute_ms": {
+          "description": "Computation time in milliseconds.",
+          "type": "number"
+        },
+        "computed_at": {
+          "description": "When it was computed (UTC, ISO 8601).",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "deterministic": {
+          "description": "Always true: same input, same result.",
+          "type": "boolean"
+        },
+        "engine": {
+          "description": "Engine name and version.",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "ephemeris": {
+          "description": "Ephemeris used (NASA/JPL DE440).",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "frame": {
+          "description": "Reference frame of the positions.",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "input_sha256": {
+          "description": "SHA-256 of the canonical input.",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "llm_used": {
+          "description": "Always false: no language model is involved.",
+          "type": "boolean"
+        },
+        "payment": {
+          "description": "How this call was paid: protocol ('free' or 'none'), price and the free calls remaining.",
+          "type": "object"
+        },
+        "reproducibility": {
+          "description": "How to reproduce and check this result.",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "result_sha256": {
+          "description": "SHA-256 of the canonical 'result'; check it with verify_result_hash.",
+          "type": "string"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "engine",
+        "deterministic",
+        "llm_used",
+        "input_sha256",
+        "result_sha256"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "result": {
+      "description": "The calculation result.",
+      "properties": {
+        "doshas": {
+          "description": "Manglik (Kuja), Kaal Sarp and Sade Sati / Dhaiya, each with whether it applies, the rule used and the relevant dates.",
+          "type": "object"
+        },
+        "settings": {
+          "description": "Settings applied: sidereal zodiac, ayanamsa (name and value in degrees), lunar node type, house system and divisional-chart rules.",
+          "type": "object"
+        },
+        "subject": {
+          "description": "The resolved input: 'time' (local input, time zone and historical UTC offset, UT, Julian days, Delta T) and, when given, 'location' (latitude, longitude).",
+          "type": "object"
+        },
+        "warnings": {
+          "description": "Notes on the input or the calculation (for example an assumed noon for an unknown birth time). Present only when there is something to say.",
+          "type": "array"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "subject",
+        "settings",
+        "doshas"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "endpoint",
+    "result",
+    "meta"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Changed3 schema fields changedOct 5, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / options / description

Added value: +"Optional calculation settings; every default is the common Parashari convention."

addedInput schema / properties / options / properties / ayanamsa / description

Added value: +"Sidereal reference (ayanamsa). Default 'lahiri' (Chitrapaksha), the Indian standard."

addedInput schema / properties / options / properties / include_outer_planets / description
```
Added value: +"Also return Uranus, Neptune and Pluto (not used in classical Jyotish)."
```

First observedOct 3, 2026

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world behavior, and the description adds genuinely new context: deterministic computation via JPL DE440 with no LLM, a meta.result_sha256 on every result, partial Kaal Sarp cases flagged, and paid access ($0.15/call, first 3 free via x402/MPP). This is rich disclosure beyond the structured hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the three doshas and their outputs before the operational details. Dense and mostly waste-free, though the pricing/REST endpoint sentence is longer than needed purely for tool selection and pushes the line count up.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-value explanation is unnecessary; the description covers scope, determinism, hashing, partial-case handling, date coverage, and cost. Nothing an agent needs to invoke this correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with 10 params, so the schema already explains date/time/datetime alternatives, timezone resolution, ayanamsa, node_type, house_system, and ambiguous_time handling. The description only indirectly touches parameters (e.g. 'status on a given date' implying on_date), so it adds little beyond the schema. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource (Vedic doshas) and enumerates exactly which ones it computes (Manglik/Kuja, Kaal Sarp, Sade Sati/Dhaiya), with the rule applied and dates. This clearly separates it from siblings like kundli, gun_milan, or vimshottari_dasha, which cover different computations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives strong context for when this tool applies (dosha-specific analysis, status on a given date, 100-year date ranges) and notes the price and free-call allowance. It stops short of explicitly naming alternatives such as kundli_full or vedic_report or stating when NOT to use this tool, so it is clear but not fully routing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Astro Agents - deterministic Western + Vedic astrology tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.