Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

agentcheck

by io.github.agentwares
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

agentcheck_get_status

Read-onlyIdempotent

Current status of a public monitored target: overall state, uptime over 24h/7d/30d, last check time, last nightly scores, open incidents and the badge/status URLs. Use the owner (GitHub login) and target slug from the status page URL https://agentwares-agentcheck.vercel.app//. No API key needed.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "owner": "<owner>",
      "slug": "<slug>"
    },
    "name": "agentcheck_get_status"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugYestarget slug, e.g. demo
ownerYesGitHub login of the target's owner, e.g. demo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, and closed-world behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds value beyond that by disclosing the auth requirement ('No API key needed') and scoping the tool to public targets only, which the annotations do not convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, both front-loaded: the payload of returned fields comes first, the parameter-sourcing note second. The field enumeration is dense but each item is distinct and informative, with no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description compensates by enumerating the returned fields, and it covers auth, target scope, and parameter derivation. Nothing an agent needs to call this correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description goes further by clarifying that owner is a GitHub login and that both owner and slug are read directly off the status page URL. That sourcing guidance is genuinely useful beyond the schema's bare examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific retrieval verb and resource ('Current status of a public monitored target') and enumerates exactly what is returned: overall state, uptime windows, last check time, nightly scores, open incidents, and badge/status URLs. An agent can distinguish it from siblings like list_incidents or statuspage_preview without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete context for when the tool applies ('public monitored target') and explains how to obtain the two required arguments from the status page URL. It stops short of naming an alternative tool or an explicit when-not-to-use condition, so it is clear context rather than full routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All agentcheck toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources