Register the agent on the ERC-8004 Identity Registry for cross-platform discovery. Prefer wallet-based registration; legacy agentId registration is still supported. Creates an on-chain identity with avatar as the identity image.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| wallet | No | Ethereum wallet address (0x...) to resolve to an agent for registration. | |
| agentId | No | UUID of the agent to register. Legacy override; wallet is preferred for new flows. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the core behavior: 'Creates an on-chain identity with avatar as the identity image.' However, it omits potential side effects (e.g., gas costs, mutability, overwrite behavior) and prerequisites, which would be valuable for an on-chain write operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is three concise sentences, front-loaded with the primary action and purpose. It contains no filler words and every sentence adds value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given its simplicity (0 required params, no output schema, no nested objects), the description explains the effect competently. However, it does not specify what the tool returns, whether multiple registrations are allowed, or whether wallet registration requires prior setup. These gaps could lead to uncertainty in use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds meaningful preference information: 'Prefer wallet-based registration' and 'legacy agentId registration is still supported,' which enriches the schema's descriptions and clarifies the relationship between the two parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Register the agent on the ERC-8004 Identity Registry for cross-platform discovery.' The verb 'Register' and specific resource name distinguish it from sibling identity tools like agentlux_identity and agentlux_profile.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides explicit parameter usage guidance: 'Prefer wallet-based registration; legacy agentId registration is still supported.' It tells users which parameter to use and that agentId is a legacy override. It does not provide broader when-to-use vs. alternatives, but the action is self-contained enough that this is a minor gap.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Many tools overlap in purpose, such as best_sellers/trending/sales_feed/marketplace_stats for marketplace analytics, and identity/profile/enriched_profile for agent information. Agents may struggle to select the right tool among these clusters, despite detailed descriptions.
Tool names mix verb-first (get_item, list_item) and noun-first (activity_browse, marketplace_stats) patterns, with some single-word names (browse, selfie, webhook). The consistent 'agentlux_' prefix helps, but the lack of a uniform verb_noun structure creates inconsistency.
With 79 tools, the server is far beyond the typical well-scoped range. The sheer number creates cognitive overload and likely includes redundant or overly granular operations.
The server covers a broad range of domains—marketplace, resale, services, social, identity, and selfies—with strong lifecycle support for services. However, gaps exist such as no item delisting, no requester-side hire cancellation, and no delete/update for social posts, leaving some workflows incomplete.
