Skip to main content
Glama

Remove an HTTPS link

delete_instance_link
DestructiveIdempotent

Remove an HTTPS link from list_instance_links: its URL stops working within seconds and the port closes to Runcrate's proxy within about a minute.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "instance_id": "<instance_id>",
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "delete_instance_link"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesLink ID from list_instance_links
workspaceNoWorkspace ID (optional: defaults to the authenticated workspace)
environmentNoEnvironment name (optional: defaults to the environment this session acts in)
instance_idYesInstance ID

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / env
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Environment name (optional — defaults to main)",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • addedInput schema / properties / environment
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Environment name (optional: defaults to the environment this session acts in)",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / properties / workspace / description
      Previous value: -"Workspace ID (optional — defaults to authenticated workspace)"New value: +"Workspace ID (optional: defaults to the authenticated workspace)"
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, idempotentHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, so safety is covered. The description earns credit for adding effect latency beyond that: the URL dies within seconds and the port closes to Runcrate's proxy in about a minute, which tells the agent the change is immediate and not undoable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, front-loaded with the action, with zero filler; the timing clause is the only elaboration and it is load-bearing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema the description needn't describe returns, and annotations carry the destructive/idempotent profile. It adds the ID provenance and effect timing, though it says nothing about permissions or whether dependent resources are affected.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and every parameter is documented in-schema, so the baseline is 3. The description's pointer to list_instance_links for the link ID only restates the schema's own 'Link ID from list_instance_links' text and adds nothing about workspace/environment defaults.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Remove) and resource (HTTPS link) and scopes it to links from list_instance_links, which cleanly separates it from create_instance_link and list_instance_links. An agent can identify the operation without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The prerequisite is implied by naming list_instance_links as the source of the link, but there is no explicit when-to-use/when-not statement or named alternative. Usage is inferable rather than stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.