Skip to main content
Glama

MiniURL get_account_status

get_account_status
Read-onlyIdempotent

Inspect the current guest/free/pro account status, remaining quota, and feature availability.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNo
metaNo
errorNo
successYes
approvalNo
retryableNo
request_idYes
retry_afterNo
next_actionsNo
required_scopeNo
user_action_requiredNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / type
      Previous value: -[
      -  "object",
      -  "array",
      -  "null"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "object",
      +  "array",
      +  "string",
      +  "number",
      +  "boolean",
      +  "null"
      +]
  2. Changed7 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Previous value: -trueNew value: +false
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / additionalProperties
      Added value: +true
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / type
      Previous value: -[
      -  "object",
      -  "array",
      -  "string",
      -  "number",
      -  "boolean",
      -  "null"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "object",
      +  "array",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / error / oneOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "additionalProperties": true,
      -    "properties": {
      -      "code": {
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "message": {
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "required_scope": {
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "retry_after": {
      -        "minimum": 0,
      -        "type": "integer"
      -      },
      -      "retryable": {
      -        "type": "boolean"
      -      },
      -      "user_action_required": {
      -        "type": "boolean"
      -      }
      -    },
      -    "type": "object"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "additionalProperties": true,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "code": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "message": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "required_scope": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "retry_after": {
      +        "minimum": 0,
      +        "type": "integer"
      +      },
      +      "retryable": {
      +        "type": "boolean"
      +      },
      +      "user_action_required": {
      +        "type": "boolean"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "code",
      +      "message",
      +      "retryable"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / request_id / minLength
      Added value: +8
    • changedOutput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "request_id"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "success",
      +  "request_id"
      +]
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "approval": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "data": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "object",
      +        "array",
      +        "string",
      +        "number",
      +        "boolean",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "oneOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "additionalProperties": true,
      +          "properties": {
      +            "code": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "message": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "required_scope": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "retry_after": {
      +              "minimum": 0,
      +              "type": "integer"
      +            },
      +            "retryable": {
      +              "type": "boolean"
      +            },
      +            "user_action_required": {
      +              "type": "boolean"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "type": "object"
      +        }
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "meta": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "next_actions": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "request_id": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "required_scope": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "retry_after": {
      +      "minimum": 0,
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    "retryable": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "success": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "user_action_required": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "request_id"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint, so the safety profile is known. The description adds context about the information returned (quota and feature availability) but does not disclose any potential behavioral nuances such as authentication requirements or error conditions. The bar for additional disclosure is met minimally, but not beyond that.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. It clearly states the action and the key aspects of the resource, making it efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is very simple with no parameters and the presence of an output schema. The description explains what the tool returns (status, quota, features) and its read-only nature is covered by annotations. However, it does not mention whether authentication is required or how to interpret the quota, so a bit more context could be useful, but this is largely complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the schema is trivially fully covered. The description does not need to explain parameter semantics; the baseline of 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a clear verb 'inspect' and names the specific resource (account status) along with the aspects covered (guest/free/pro tier, remaining quota, feature availability). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like start_pro_upgrade or create_guest_token that modify or create account-related entities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool instead of alternatives. The description implies usage for checking current status but does not explicitly contrast it with account-modifying tools or mention scenarios like pre-upgrade checks. There is no 'when not to use' context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a clearly distinct resource and action: links, domains, tags, auth, and account status are all separate concerns. Even similar tools like shorten_url and bulk_create_links are differentiated by single vs. batch creation, and check_alias is distinct from get_link by checking availability before creation.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., add_domain, delete_link, list_tags, verify_registration_code). Mixed verb styles like tag/untag and shorten_url are still predictable and fit the established convention.

Tool Count3/5

At 23 tools, the set is on the heavy side and falls in the 16-25 borderline range. The number is somewhat justified by the broad scope (links, domains, tags, auth, analytics), but it approaches the upper limit where an agent may have difficulty selecting between many options.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of short links (create, read, update, delete, list, stats), domain management (add, delete, verify, list), tags (create, list, delete, tag/untag), and account/auth flows (guest tokens, registration, pro upgrade). It is hard to identify any critical missing operation for the stated purpose.

Resources