get_qr_designer_linkGet a link to the free useqr design studio, optionally prefilled with a URL. The designer lets a user style dots, corners, and colors, embed a logo, and export the QR code as PNG, SVG, JPEG, WebP, or PDF. Share this link when a user wants a custom-designed or print-ready QR code.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | No | Optional http(s) URL to prefill in the designer so the QR code is ready immediately. |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden, and it does well by stating that the tool returns a link and what the designer lets the user do. It does not cover edge-case behavior such as invalid URL handling or link expiration, but those are minor for a simple link-returning tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is front-loaded with the primary action and then adds the designer's capabilities and the target use case. The list of export formats is slightly long but earns its place by clarifying the print-ready benefit.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description is complete: it says what the tool returns, how the parameter affects the result, what the user can do with the link, and when to use it. Nothing essential for invoking the tool correctly is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the schema already fully describes the optional URL parameter including max length and purpose. The description only restates 'optionally prefilled with a URL' and adds no meaningful semantics beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb and resource: 'Get a link to the free useqr design studio', with a clear optional prefill behavior. It distinguishes itself from the sibling QR-generation tools by framing this as a link to a custom-design/print-ready workflow rather than direct QR generation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives an explicit usage cue: 'Share this link when a user wants a custom-designed or print-ready QR code.' It does not name the sibling alternatives or state when not to use them, but the context is clear enough for an agent to choose this tool for the designer-link use case.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool targets a clearly distinct QR-code workflow: simple image generation, dynamic/trackable codes, and the designer for custom styles. The descriptions provide strong use-case guidance, so there is no real ambiguity between them.
All tool names follow the same lower_snake_case verb_noun pattern: create_dynamic_qr_code, generate_qr_code, and get_qr_designer_link. The naming style is uniform and predictable.
Three tools is well-scoped for this server's purpose: basic QR generation, dynamic QR guidance, and designer access. Each tool earns its place without unnecessary overlap or bloat.
The server covers basic QR generation and routes users to dynamic and design workflows, but create_dynamic_qr_code only returns instructions rather than actually creating a dynamic code. There are also no tools for managing existing codes or accessing analytics, leaving gaps for full lifecycle workflows.