Skip to main content
Glama

Entity Search

search_entities
Read-onlyIdempotent

Search Loa runtime hospital and provider entity pages by name or state. Use this before get_entity_prices when the user names a hospital or provider but does not know the exact Loa slug.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum number of results, default 20, max 50.
queryNoHospital or provider name to search for.
stateNoTwo-letter state code or full state name, e.g. CA or New York.
entity_typeNoOptional filter for hospital or provider entities.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYes
totalYes
entitiesYes
provenanceYes

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, covering safety. The description adds useful context about searching runtime entity pages and finding slugs, but no additional behavioral traits beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences: the first states the action, the second provides critical usage guidance. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 4 parameters (all described in schema), output schema exists, and annotations are present, the description is complete: it covers purpose, usage, and behavior adequately.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all 4 parameters. The description mentions searching by name or state, which aligns with the query and state params but does not add new meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches Loa runtime hospital and provider entity pages by name or state, and distinguishes it from siblings by noting it is used before get_entity_prices when the exact slug is unknown.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit guidance: 'Use this before get_entity_prices when the user names a hospital or provider but does not know the exact Loa slug.' This tells exactly when to use the tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: search tools cover different entities, pricing tools cover different scenarios (hospital, market, estimate), and the explanation and update tools are unique. No two tools overlap in function.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (get_, search_, explain_, suggest_, submit_), which is clear and predictable. However, the verbs are not uniform across all tools (e.g., 'get' vs 'search' for lookups), introducing slight inconsistency.

Tool Count5/5

With 12 tools, the server is well-scoped for healthcare pricing. Each tool serves a necessary function—search, pricing variations, profile, explanation, and updates—without excess or deficiency.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the full workflow: entity/code searching, multiple pricing queries, price source explanation, entity profiles, and update submissions. No obvious gaps for the intended domain.