List all Zugabot paid developer services with prices and x402 pay endpoints. Free.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Lacks annotations, but description adds that the tool is 'Free' and lists contents. However, it does not disclose potential side effects, authentication needs, or rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise: a single sentence with the key information upfront. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no parameters and an output schema present, the description adds useful detail about return contents. Missing sibling differentiation but otherwise complete for a simple list tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, and schema coverage is 100%. The description correctly adds no parameter info, meeting the baseline for zero parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'list', the resource 'all Zugabot paid developer services', and specifies inclusion of 'prices and x402 pay endpoints'. This makes the purpose highly specific and distinguishable from siblings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'service_info' or 'preview'. The description does not provide context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing services, getting details, previewing output, running a trial, generating an SDK snippet, and obtaining payment instructions. No overlap.
Most names follow a verb_noun pattern (get_*, list_*, run_trial), but 'preview' is a standalone verb and 'service_info' is noun_noun, causing minor inconsistency.
6 tools is appropriate for a service offering paid developer tools with free trials, previews, and payment guidance. Each tool earns its place.
The tool set covers the full workflow: discovery (list_services, service_info), evaluation (preview, run_trial), integration (get_instant_sdk_snippet), and payment guidance (get_payment_guide). No obvious gaps.