Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so all five parameters are already documented in the schema, including the base-units caveat. The description only restates resource and amount at a high level and adds no semantics for provider_id, mime_type, or nonce binding, so the baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.