Skip to main content
Glama

Persistent Project Context for xAI Grok

Tag Intel

tag_intel
Read-onlyIdempotent

Discover tag patterns, co-occurrence, candidates, and merge suggestions across all namepoints. Optionally suggest tags for a specific handle.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
handleNoOptional: suggest tags for this specific namepoint

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -{
      -  "properties": {
      -    "content": {
      -      "items": {
      -        "properties": {
      -          "text": {
      -            "description": "Human-readable tool result.",
      -            "type": "string"
      -          },
      -          "type": {
      -            "const": "text",
      -            "type": "string"
      -          }
      -        },
      -        "required": [
      -          "type",
      -          "text"
      -        ],
      -        "type": "object"
      -      },
      -      "type": "array"
      -    },
      -    "isError": {
      -      "description": "True when the tool failed.",
      -      "type": "boolean"
      -    }
      -  },
      -  "required": [
      -    "content",
      -    "isError"
      -  ],
      -  "type": "object"
      -}New value: +null
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "content": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "text": {
      +            "description": "Human-readable tool result.",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "type": {
      +            "const": "text",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "type",
      +          "text"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "isError": {
      +      "description": "True when the tool failed.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "content",
      +    "isError"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, which already cover the safety profile. The description adds behavioral context about the tag discovery and suggestion capabilities, but does not disclose details like return format, volume of results, or any additional side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, front-loads the primary purpose (tag pattern discovery), and quickly mentions the additional suggestion feature. It uses an efficient two-clause structure with no redundant or overly verbose information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with one optional parameter, no output schema, and annotations that define the safety profile, the description is mostly complete. The main gap is it does not specify the output format or how results are returned, such as whether suggestions include confidence scores or structured data.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The parameter schema covers the handle parameter with a description, achieving 100% schema description coverage. The tool description mentions optional tag suggestions for a specific handle, which supplements the schema. However, it does not add deeper meaning beyond the schema's own description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: discovering tag patterns, co-occurrence, candidates, and merge suggestions across all namepoints. It also mentions an optional behavior (suggesting tags for a specific handle), which adds another clear capability.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use the tool—when tag-related analysis or suggestions are needed—and the optional handle parameter provides context for a specific use case. However, it does not explicitly state when NOT to use this tool or mention alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.