Skip to main content
Glama

protocol_health_sync_universe

[Protocol Health Oracle] Force an immediate sync of the tracked-protocol universe from DefiLlama (TVL > $1M). Runs automatically once/day; use this to trigger it on demand.

Use when you want the tracked universe re-synced from DefiLlama (TVL above $1M), which also runs automatically on a schedule. Not for routine reads.

Behavior: writes state upstream (not read-only); needs the credentials or wallet signature noted above where applicable.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "protocol_health_sync_universe"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare write, open-world, non-idempotent, and non-destructive behavior, and the description adds useful context: it writes state upstream and may require credentials or a wallet signature. The phrase 'where applicable' leaves some ambiguity, but there is no annotation contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The action is front-loaded, but the second sentence largely repeats the first by restating the DefiLlama TVL sync and automatic schedule. There is some redundancy, though the description remains short.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter trigger tool with no output schema, the description covers the action, scope, schedule, write behavior, and credential caveat. It does not describe the post-sync return or downstream effect, but it is otherwise sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The empty schema makes additional parameter semantics unnecessary.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: forcing an immediate sync of the tracked-protocol universe from DefiLlama, scoped to TVL above $1M. It distinguishes from routine reads, but does not explicitly name a sibling tool such as protocol_health_refresh_all.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It clearly says to use this when the tracked universe needs re-syncing on demand because it otherwise runs automatically, and it excludes routine reads. It gives clear context but names no alternative tool or competing sibling.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.