Skip to main content
Glama

Update tax rate

well_update_tax_rate
Destructive

Change a tax rate's name, linked ledger accounts, default status, active status or end date. Its rate, tax type, country and start date stay fixed after creation.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameNo
is_activeNo
is_defaultNo
tax_rate_idYes
effective_toNo
workspace_idNoTarget workspace. Omit when the token authorizes one workspace. Required when it authorizes several — a write lands in exactly one workspace and this call would not say which.
conversation_idNoThe conversation id returned by the previous Well result, in its meta under well/conversation_id, in its structuredContent, or in its JSON text block. Pass it back on every call in the same conversation, including a call a card makes, so the chosen workspace and the earlier answers still apply. It decides the conversation on its own: nothing the host states about the session replaces it. Omit it only on the first call of a conversation.
idempotency_keyNoOptional client-supplied key. A retried write with the same key returns the original result instead of re-applying the operation.
workspace_scopeNoRestrict this call to the family: the token's primary workspace plus the company workspaces under it that you are a member of. Unrelated authorized workspaces drop out of the read; row reads merge across the family, while a per-workspace figure still reports exactly one workspace.
collected_account_idNo
deductible_account_idNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
codeNo
dataNo
errorNo
successYes
reply_linesNo
conversation_idNoThe conversation this result belongs to. Pass it back as the conversation_id argument on every later Well call in the same conversation.
near_candidatesNo
newly_connectedNoTools that connected to this workspace since the last result and that no session was told about yet, oldest first. Present only when at least one tool is new. The connected-line rule says when to tell an entry; when it does, one line per entry, in the person's language: "<name> is connected.". Never fold several entries into one sentence. Each entry comes back once, on one result only: never repeat its line later.
conversation_id_noteNoPresent only when the server opened a fresh lane, stating that no choice recorded earlier was read.
conversation_id_sourceNoWhere the conversation id came from: the host's own request meta, the caller's argument, or a fresh lane the server opened.
near_candidates_truncatedNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed12 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / effective_to / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedInput schema / properties / effective_to / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / code
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / country / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / country / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / effective_from / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / effective_from / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / effective_to / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / effective_to / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / near_candidates
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "additionalProperties": false,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "company_id": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "name": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "company_id",
      +      "name"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / near_candidates_truncated
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / reply_lines
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
  2. Added

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, so the mutation profile is known. The description's genuine addition is the immutability contract, which tells the agent what cannot be changed after creation — useful context, but it says nothing about irreversibility, permissions, or side effects on existing transactions that reference the rate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero filler. The mutable-field list comes first and the constraint sentence follows, so the agent gets the affordance before the boundary. Every clause earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive mutation tool the description covers the essential question (what can I change, what can't I) and an output schema exists, so return values need not be explained. Gaps remain around authorization requirements and whether reassigning ledger accounts retroactively affects posted entries.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With only 36% schema coverage and 11 parameters, the description carries real weight: it maps collected_account_id/deductible_account_id to 'linked ledger accounts', is_default/is_active to 'default status'/'active status', and effective_to to 'end date'. The remaining identified parameters (workspace_id, conversation_id, idempotency_key) are already documented in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

A precise verb-plus-resource statement that also enumerates exactly which fields are mutable (name, linked ledger accounts, default status, active status, end date). The second sentence ('rate, tax type, country and start date stay fixed') draws a sharp boundary that distinguishes this from well_create_tax_rate and well_delete_tax_rate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The immutability clause implies that changing a rate, tax type, country or start date requires a different approach (delete and recreate), but the description never names that alternative or states when to prefer it. Usage is inferable rather than explicit, and no prerequisites or preconditions are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources