Skip to main content
Glama

Set own company

well_set_own_company
Destructive

Set which company the workspace itself IS — the confirmed own-company anchor.

REQUIRED: company_id — a company that ALREADY EXISTS in this workspace. Obtain it with well_query_records (companies) or well_create_company; this tool never creates one.

This is a deliberate, accounting-critical write, not a convenience. Anchoring the own company overwrites the workspace's legal identity on its accounting settings (including clearing fields when the anchor moves), records a manual-confirm audit row, and syncs the billing customer name. It never re-posts existing journal entries. Confirm the exact company with the user before calling; never guess one from a name.

Only a workspace owner or admin may set the own company. A caller without that role is refused, not silently ignored.

well_start_close hard-gates on this anchor: a workspace with no own company cannot start a close.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
company_idYesThe UUID of a company already in this workspace to anchor as its own company.
workspace_idNoTarget workspace. Omit when the token authorizes one workspace. Required when it authorizes several — a write lands in exactly one workspace and this call would not say which.
conversation_idNoThe conversation id returned by the previous Well result, in its meta under well/conversation_id, in its structuredContent, or in its JSON text block. Pass it back on every call in the same conversation, including a call a card makes, so the chosen workspace and the earlier answers still apply. It decides the conversation on its own: nothing the host states about the session replaces it. Omit it only on the first call of a conversation.
idempotency_keyNoOptional client-supplied key. A retried write with the same key returns the original result instead of re-applying the operation.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNo
successYes
own_company_idNo
conversation_idNoThe conversation this result belongs to. Pass it back as the conversation_id argument on every later Well call in the same conversation.
conversation_id_noteNoPresent only when the server opened a fresh lane, stating that no choice recorded earlier was read.
conversation_id_sourceNoWhere the conversation id came from: the host's own request meta, the caller's argument, or a fresh lane the server opened.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / conversation_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The conversation id returned by the previous Well result, in its meta under well/conversation_id, in its structuredContent, or in its JSON text block. Pass it back on every call in the same conversation, including a call a card makes, so the chosen workspace and the earlier answers still apply. It decides the conversation on its own: nothing the host states about the session replaces it. Omit it only on the first call of a conversation.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / conversation_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The conversation this result belongs to. Pass it back as the conversation_id argument on every later Well call in the same conversation.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / conversation_id_note
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Present only when the server opened a fresh lane, stating that no choice recorded earlier was read.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / conversation_id_source
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Where the conversation id came from: the host's own request meta, the caller's argument, or a fresh lane the server opened.",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "host_meta",
      +    "argument",
      +    "minted"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / workspace_id / description
      Previous value: -"Target workspace. Omit to use the only authorized workspace, or (for read tools) to query all authorized workspaces grouped by workspace. Required for write tools when the token authorizes more than one workspace."New value: +"Target workspace. Omit when the token authorizes one workspace. Required when it authorizes several — a write lands in exactly one workspace and this call would not say which."
  3. Added

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Despite destructiveHint already being true, the description adds substantial behavioral detail: overwriting the workspace's legal identity on accounting settings, clearing fields when the anchor moves, recording a manual-confirm audit row, syncing the billing customer name, and explicitly not re-posting journal entries. This goes well beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long but every section earns its place given the high-risk, accounting-critical nature of the operation. It is front-loaded with the core purpose, then uses clear REQUIRED and warning sections for prerequisites, side effects, authorization, and dependencies. No filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers prerequisites, behavioral side effects, authorization requirements, failure mode for unauthorized callers, and downstream dependencies. An output schema exists, so the absence of return-value details is acceptable. An agent has everything needed to decide whether and how to call this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds meaning beyond the schema for company_id by stating it must reference an already-existing company, how to obtain it, and that this tool never creates one. That extra semantic guidance justifies a 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Set which company the workspace itself IS — the confirmed own-company anchor.' It clearly distinguishes itself from siblings like well_create_company, well_update_company, and well_delete_company by emphasizing that this tool anchors an existing company rather than creating or editing one.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives explicit usage requirements: the company must already exist, must be obtained via well_query_records or well_create_company, and must be confirmed with the user. It also states who may call it (owner/admin), what happens for unauthorized callers, and that well_start_close hard-gates on this anchor.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources