Skip to main content
Glama

List given links

well_list_given_links
Read-onlyIdempotent

List every link the workspace has given out that still opens, in one read: the workspace invitation, the customer pages of invoices, the links of draft invoices, the document links sent by email, the board and widget shares, and the person's own linked WhatsApp number. It reads only: it makes, changes and stops no link.

Call it when the person asks which links they gave, what is shared, or what is still open to people outside, in any language ("Which links did I give?", "Quels liens ai-je donnés ?"). Call it at once: never ask which kind of link they mean, since this one read lists every kind. Never call well_get_workspace_invite_link or well_get_invoice_draft_link to answer that: they make a link.

Each row says what the link opens (opens), its name (label) and who holds it (holder_kind and holder): the role the invitation gives, the invoice's customer, the number of links of a share (link_count), or the person's own number. The links of one board are one row. Nothing counts who opened a link, so never say how many people opened one.

Answer with one numbered line per row, under the total of rows and the workspace name. Never show a URL, a token or an id: when the person wants a link itself, the tool of that kind gives it. With more_count above zero, end with "and N others". With no row, say no link is open on the workspace.

A member sees the shares they made and their own WhatsApp number; an owner or admin also sees the invitations, the invoice pages and the document links.

When the token authorizes one workspace, call this directly — no workspace call is needed first. When it authorizes several, this read will not guess which one you mean: pass workspace_id on the call.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
workspace_idNoTarget workspace. Omit when the token authorizes one workspace. Required when it authorizes several: this read reports one workspace's own figures and will not choose which.
conversation_idNoThe conversation id returned by the previous Well result, in its meta under well/conversation_id, in its structuredContent, or in its JSON text block. Pass it back on every call in the same conversation, including a call a card makes, so the chosen workspace and the earlier answers still apply. It decides the conversation on its own: nothing the host states about the session replaces it. Omit it only on the first call of a conversation.
workspace_scopeNoRestrict this call to the family: the token's primary workspace plus the company workspaces under it that you are a member of. Unrelated authorized workspaces drop out of the read; row reads merge across the family, while a per-workspace figure still reports exactly one workspace.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNo
linksNoThe live links, newest first, at most 20; your own WhatsApp number last.
successYes
more_countNoHow many more live links exist beyond the rows shown.
workspace_nameNo
conversation_idNoThe conversation this result belongs to. Pass it back as the conversation_id argument on every later Well call in the same conversation.
newly_connectedNoTools that connected to this workspace since the last result and that no session was told about yet, oldest first. Present only when at least one tool is new. The connected-line rule says when to tell an entry; when it does, one line per entry, in the person's language: "<name> is connected.". Never fold several entries into one sentence. Each entry comes back once, on one result only: never repeat its line later.
resolved_workspaceNoThe workspace that answered, when the caller named none and the token authorizes several.
conversation_id_noteNoPresent only when the server opened a fresh lane, stating that no choice recorded earlier was read.
conversation_id_sourceNoWhere the conversation id came from: the host's own request meta, the caller's argument, or a fresh lane the server opened.
more_count_is_lower_boundNoTrue when the workspace has more shares than one read holds, so `more_count` is a minimum.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed10 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / links / items / properties / created_at / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / links / items / properties / created_at / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / links / items / properties / expires_at / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / links / items / properties / expires_at / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / links / items / properties / holder / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / links / items / properties / holder / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / links / items / properties / label / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / links / items / properties / label / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / resolved_workspace / properties / name / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / resolved_workspace / properties / name / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive, and the description adds genuinely new behavior: it never shows URLs, tokens or ids; it does not count opens; truncation surfaces as `more_count`; visibility differs by role (member sees own shares and WhatsApp number, owner/admin also sees invitations, invoice pages and document links). These are non-obvious constraints an agent would otherwise get wrong.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with purpose and usage, then output semantics, permissions, and workspace routing — every block is coherent and earns its place. It is nonetheless long, and the answer-formatting prescriptions ('one numbered line per row', end with 'and N others') are presentation rules that sit past the point of tool selection and could be trimmed or moved to a prompt.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, yet the description still explains the semantic meaning the schema cannot: that board links collapse into one row with `link_count`, that `holder_kind`/`holder` varies by link type, and the empty-result case. Combined with the permission model and multi-workspace routing, an agent has everything needed to call it and interpret it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and all three parameters are documented in-schema, so the baseline is 3. The description adds routing meaning beyond the schema: call directly when the token authorizes one workspace, and pass `workspace_id` when it authorizes several because the read will not guess — useful operator-level guidance that the schema alone does not convey.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('List every link the workspace has given out that still opens') and then enumerates exactly which link kinds are included: invitation, invoice customer pages, draft-invoice links, email document links, board/widget shares, and the person's WhatsApp number. That enumeration lets an agent tell it apart from the many link-related siblings without opening a schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit triggers ('which links they gave', 'what is still open to people outside'), includes multilingual example utterances, and pre-empts a common failure mode with 'never ask which kind of link they mean, since this one read lists every kind'. It also names two siblings not to use for this question and explains why (they make links).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources