Skip to main content
Glama

Create question reminders

well_create_collect_question_reminder
Idempotent

Create the reminders of the question that ends a vendor pick on WhatsApp: send the invoice request of a vendor whose portal did not respond, or later.

Call it once, in the turn that asks that question, with the collect id the facts give for the vendor the question names. Well then reminds the person at 1 minute and at 30 minutes, and at 24 hours tells them that no request went out. The person's next message ends the reminders. Never call it for another question, and say nothing about this call in the reply.

When the token authorizes one workspace, call this directly — no workspace call is needed first. When it authorizes several, this read will not guess which one you mean: pass workspace_id on the call.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
collect_idYesThe `collect` id of the vendor the question names, from the facts of the end-of-collect turn.
workspace_idNoTarget workspace. Omit when the token authorizes one workspace. Required when it authorizes several — a write lands in exactly one workspace and this call would not say which.
conversation_idNoThe conversation id returned by the previous Well result, in its meta under well/conversation_id, in its structuredContent, or in its JSON text block. Pass it back on every call in the same conversation, including a call a card makes, so the chosen workspace and the earlier answers still apply. It decides the conversation on its own: nothing the host states about the session replaces it. Omit it only on the first call of a conversation.
idempotency_keyNoOptional client-supplied key. A retried write with the same key returns the original result instead of re-applying the operation.
workspace_scopeNoRestrict this call to the family: the token's primary workspace plus the company workspaces under it that you are a member of. Unrelated authorized workspaces drop out of the read; row reads merge across the family, while a per-workspace figure still reports exactly one workspace.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNo
refusalNo
successYesTrue when the reminders of the question are armed.
conversation_idNoThe conversation this result belongs to. Pass it back as the conversation_id argument on every later Well call in the same conversation.
newly_connectedNoTools that connected to this workspace since the last result and that no session was told about yet, oldest first. Present only when at least one tool is new. The connected-line rule says when to tell an entry; when it does, one line per entry, in the person's language: "<name> is connected.". Never fold several entries into one sentence. Each entry comes back once, on one result only: never repeat its line later.
conversation_id_noteNoPresent only when the server opened a fresh lane, stating that no choice recorded earlier was read.
conversation_id_sourceNoWhere the conversation id came from: the host's own request meta, the caller's argument, or a fresh lane the server opened.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Well beyond the annotations, it discloses the reminder cadence (1 minute, 30 minutes, 24 hours with a no-request-went-out notice) and the termination condition (the person's next message ends the reminders), plus the output convention of saying nothing about the call in the reply. One flaw: the workspace paragraph calls this 'this read', which sits oddly against readOnlyHint=false and the tool's create semantics — a copy-paste slip rather than a deliberate contradiction, but it blurs write/read expectations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose, timing, and exclusions are front-loaded and every substantive sentence carries information. However, the trailing workspace paragraph largely duplicates what the schema already documents for `workspace_id`, and the opening phrasing is heavier than it needs to be.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Annotations cover the safety profile and an output schema exists, so the description needn't explain return values; it fills the important remaining gaps — trigger timing, reminder schedule, what ends the reminders, and workspace selection. The only weak spot is the misleading 'read' wording in the workspace paragraph, which an agent could misread as a non-mutating call.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description restates the `collect_id` provenance (from the facts of the end-of-collect turn) and repeats the multi-workspace rule already written in the `workspace_id` schema description; it adds no new meaning for `conversation_id`, `idempotency_key`, or `workspace_scope`.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb and resource ('Create the reminders of the question that ends a vendor pick on WhatsApp') and scopes it to the end-of-collect turn for a vendor whose portal did not respond. An agent can tell this apart from the many well_create_* siblings because no other tool schedules reminder follow-ups. The opening clause is convoluted ('the reminders of the question that ends a vendor pick'), which costs it a point versus a crisp verb+resource statement.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit trigger ('Call it once, in the turn that asks that question'), explicit input source ('with the `collect` id the facts give for the vendor the question names'), and an explicit exclusion ('Never call it for another question'). It also states the workspace-selection rule (call directly for a single-workspace token; pass `workspace_id` when several are authorized), so the agent never has to infer when or how to invoke it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources