Skip to main content
Glama

Create card

well_create_card

Add a workspace card record with its final four digits and optional card details. Supply only the final four digits; full card numbers are not accepted.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
typeNo
brandNo
issue_dateNo
start_dateNo
workspace_idNoTarget workspace. Omit when the token authorizes one workspace. Required when it authorizes several — a write lands in exactly one workspace and this call would not say which.
cardholder_nameNo
conversation_idNoThe conversation id returned by the previous Well result, in its meta under well/conversation_id, in its structuredContent, or in its JSON text block. Pass it back on every call in the same conversation, including a call a card makes, so the chosen workspace and the earlier answers still apply. It decides the conversation on its own: nothing the host states about the session replaces it. Omit it only on the first call of a conversation.
expiration_dateNo
idempotency_keyNoOptional client-supplied key. A retried write with the same key returns the original result instead of re-applying the operation.
workspace_scopeNoRestrict this call to the family: the token's primary workspace plus the company workspaces under it that you are a member of. Unrelated authorized workspaces drop out of the read; row reads merge across the family, while a per-workspace figure still reports exactly one workspace.
last_four_digitsYes

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
codeNo
dataNo
errorNo
successYes
reply_linesNo
conversation_idNoThe conversation this result belongs to. Pass it back as the conversation_id argument on every later Well call in the same conversation.
near_candidatesNo
newly_connectedNoTools that connected to this workspace since the last result and that no session was told about yet, oldest first. Present only when at least one tool is new. The connected-line rule says when to tell an entry; when it does, one line per entry, in the person's language: "<name> is connected.". Never fold several entries into one sentence. Each entry comes back once, on one result only: never repeat its line later.
conversation_id_noteNoPresent only when the server opened a fresh lane, stating that no choice recorded earlier was read.
conversation_id_sourceNoWhere the conversation id came from: the host's own request meta, the caller's argument, or a fresh lane the server opened.
near_candidates_truncatedNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed22 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / expiration_date / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedInput schema / properties / expiration_date / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedInput schema / properties / issue_date / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedInput schema / properties / issue_date / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedInput schema / properties / start_date / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedInput schema / properties / start_date / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / code
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / brand / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / brand / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / cardholder_name / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / cardholder_name / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / expiration_date / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / expiration_date / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / issue_date / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / issue_date / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / start_date / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / start_date / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / type / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data / properties / attributes / properties / type / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / near_candidates
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "additionalProperties": false,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "company_id": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "name": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "company_id",
      +      "name"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / near_candidates_truncated
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / reply_lines
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
  2. Added

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=false, so the agent knows this is a safe-but-mutating create. The description earns credit for the security constraint (full PANs rejected), but says nothing about permissions, duplicate handling, or what a created card affects downstream.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the action and then the one constraint that prevents a failed call. Nothing extraneous.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema and rich workspace_id/conversation_id/idempotency_key descriptions in the schema cover much of the surrounding complexity, and the description covers the core create action. Still missing is context on how a card record relates to accounts or transactions, which would help an agent decide to create one at all.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 36% across 11 parameters, so the description is expected to compensate — but it only addresses last_four_digits and waves at "optional card details." Fields like type, brand, issue_date, start_date, expiration_date and cardholder_name remain undocumented in both places.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"Add a workspace card record" states a specific verb and resource, and the second sentence narrows the payload to last-four-digits only. It is clearly a creation tool, distinguishable from well_update_card and well_delete_card by the verb alone, though neither sibling is named.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The instruction to supply only the final four digits is a real usage constraint, but there is no explicit when-to-use/when-not guidance relative to well_update_card or well_delete_card, and no mention of what prerequisites a card record needs before creation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources