Skip to main content
Glama

CoinLoader/BotAppStore: Get bot

get_product
Read-onlyIdempotent

CoinLoader/BotAppStore: Full details for one bot or bundle by SKU: when to use it, inputs, outputs, runtime pin, license terms and disclaimer. Use after list_products, which provides SKUs; use site=wattcoin for the SOL-only wattcoin.org view. No auth needed; read-only and live. Returns JSON, or an error if the SKU is not live.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "sku": "<sku>"
    },
    "name": "get_product"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
skuYesProduct or bundle SKU from list_products (e.g. mill-cert-matcher), case-insensitive
siteNoStore: botappstore, coinloader, or wattcoin (wattcoin.org bots, SOL only). Omit to return every storefront's entry for the SKU

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / site / description
      Previous value: -"botappstore (default), coinloader, or wattcoin (wattcoin.org bots, SOL only); omit to list every storefront's entry"New value: +"Store: botappstore, coinloader, or wattcoin (wattcoin.org bots, SOL only). Omit to return every storefront's entry for the SKU"
    • changedInput schema / properties / sku / description
      Previous value: -"Product or bundle SKU, e.g. mill-cert-matcher"New value: +"Product or bundle SKU from list_products (e.g. mill-cert-matcher), case-insensitive"
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered; the description adds genuinely new facts: no auth required, data is live, and a non-live SKU yields an error instead of a result. It stops short of describing multi-storefront merge behavior when site is omitted, which is the one remaining behavioral gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The resource and scope are front-loaded in the first clause, and every subsequent sentence contributes a prerequisite, a routing rule, or a return/error note. Slightly dense — the list of returned fields is packed into one long clause — but nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description correctly compensates by summarizing the return payload (

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema already documents that sku is case-insensitive and comes from list_products, and that wattcoin is SOL-only. The description's mention of the wattcoin view largely restates the enum's own description, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb and resource: "Full details for one bot or bundle by SKU," and enumerates exactly what those details include (inputs, outputs, runtime pin, license terms). It distinguishes itself from the sibling list_products, which only supplies SKUs, so an agent can pick the right tool without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It states an explicit prerequisite sequence — "Use after list_products, which provides SKUs" — and a conditional routing rule, "use site=wattcoin for the SOL-only wattcoin.org view." Alternative and condition are both named rather than inferred.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.