Skip to main content
Glama

VibeKit List Apps

vibekit_list_apps
Read-onlyIdempotent

List all hosted apps in your VibeKit account, each with its id, subdomain, status, and live URL. Start here to get an appId for the other app tools.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the call succeeded.
dataNoArray of hosted apps, each with id, subdomain, status, and live URL.
errorNoError message when ok is false (e.g. missing/invalid VIBEKIT_API_KEY, or an API error).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "description": "Result envelope: ok=true with data on success, ok=false with error on failure.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "description": "Array of hosted apps, each with id, subdomain, status, and live URL."
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Error message when ok is false (e.g. missing/invalid VIBEKIT_API_KEY, or an API error).",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "description": "Whether the call succeeded.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "ok"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and idempotentHint as true, so the description's lack of additional behavioral context is acceptable. The description adds that it returns specific fields, which is useful but not critical for safety assessment.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no wasted words. The first sentence states purpose and output, the second provides usage context and ties to sibling tools. Ideal structure for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, no nested objects, output schema exists), the description is fully sufficient. It covers what the tool does, what it returns, and how it fits into the broader toolset.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters (schema coverage 100%), so the description does not need to elaborate on parameters. The description still adds value by listing the returned fields, which complements the output schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('List all hosted apps'), the resource ('VibeKit account'), and the returned fields ('id, subdomain, status, and live URL'). It also distinguishes from siblings like vibekit_get_app by positioning itself as the starting point to obtain an appId.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly recommends using this tool first to get an appId for other app tools, providing clear usage context. It does not explicitly list exclusions or when not to use it, but the guidance is sufficient given the tool's simple nature.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.