Skip to main content
Glama

Excluir dívida

delete_debt
DestructiveIdempotent

Exclui uma dívida. Efeito colateral: recalcula analytics (patrimônio líquido) e insights do usuário.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "delete_debt"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesId da dívida (Debt) a excluir

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
countNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / id / description
      Added value: +"Id da dívida (Debt) a excluir"
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explicitly discloses a side effect beyond the annotations: deleting a debt recalculates analytics (net worth) and user insights. This complements the destructiveHint and idempotentHint annotations with additional consequence information, though it does not detail the exact output.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences with no filler: the primary action comes first, followed by the key side effect. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple single-parameter tool, an output schema, and annotations covering destructive/idempotent behavior, the description is nearly complete. The only small gap is the absence of explicit usage guidance, but the core purpose and side effects are fully covered.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with the single id parameter already documented as 'Id da dívida (Debt) a excluir'. The description adds no new parameter-level meaning, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Exclui uma dívida', a specific verb and resource that clearly identifies the operation as deleting a debt. This differentiates it from sibling delete_* and update_debt tools by naming the exact resource affected.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The usage context is implied by the verb 'Exclui' and the resource, so an agent can infer this is for removing debts. However, there is no explicit statement about when to prefer this over alternative tools such as update_debt or delete_transaction, or any exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.