Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It provides meaningful detail: upstream resources are deleted first, and then the page is removed from the account. It also discloses the token cost. It does not explicitly state irreversibility, but the deletion semantics are clear from the wording.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded, stating the core action in the first sentence, followed by the deletion order and cost. Every sentence adds value without redundancy or unnecessary elaboration.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter delete operation, the description is largely complete: it states what is deleted, the order of operations, and the account-level effect. Since an output schema exists, return-value documentation is not required. A brief irreversibility warning would improve it, but the current description is sufficient for an agent to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides full coverage for the single parameter page_id with the description 'Page id to delete.' The tool description adds no additional semantic detail beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb and resource: 'Delete a hosted static website and its CDN resources.' It clearly distinguishes this from sibling tools like pages.create, pages.edit, and pages.remove_custom_domain, as it targets the entire hosted page rather than a component or domain.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clearly implies this tool is for deleting an entire hosted static website from the Vee3 account. It does not explicitly name alternatives or exclusions, but the action and scope are clear enough that an agent can infer when to invoke it versus related page operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.