Skip to main content
Glama

Browse Indian Acts

list_acts
Read-only

Browse and filter enactments rather than searching their text: by jurisdiction (central or a state), issuing regulator, year and status. Use when the user wants to know WHAT exists in an area before asking what it says, or to confirm an Act's exact title before citing it. Cost: 1 credit.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo1-based page number.
sortNoSort order. `popular` is DEPRECATED and behaves as `year_desc`: it ordered by a read counter held only in the retired store. Values: `year_desc`, `year_asc`, `title_asc`, `title_desc`, `popular`.year_desc
stateNoJurisdiction slug. `central` is a value here, for Union legislation. Live counts per jurisdiction are on GET /acts/coverage.
searchNoKeep only acts whose title contains this substring, matched case-insensitively. A title filter, not a search over the text: use POST /acts/search for that.
statusNoThe publisher's lifecycle status for the act. Their claim, not our verdict: see GET /acts/{actId}/status. Values: `in_force`, `repealed`, `superseded`, `spent`.
yearToNoLatest year of enactment to include, inclusive.
categoryNoJurisdictional class of the instrument. `repealed` and `spent` are accepted for backward compatibility and resolve against the act's status instead. Values: `central`, `state`, `regulatory`, `repealed`, `spent`.
pageSizeNoResults per page (1-100).
yearFromNoEarliest year of enactment to include, inclusive. Matched against the publisher's own year field, which is occasionally corrupt, so there is no lower bound and a value below 1800 is a legitimate way to find those rows.
departmentNoAccepts both regulator slugs such as `sebi` and `rbi` and free-text state department names such as `Law Department`. Values are not limited to a fixed enum or a uniform slug format.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / category / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "enum": [
      +      "central",
      +      "state",
      +      "regulatory",
      +      "repealed",
      +      "spent"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • removedInput schema / properties / category / enum
      Removed value: -[
      -  "central",
      -  "state",
      -  "regulatory",
      -  "repealed",
      -  "spent"
      -]
    • changedInput schema / properties / state / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "enum": [
      +      "andaman-and-nicobar-islands",
      +      "andaman-nicobar",
      +      "andhra-pradesh",
      +      "arunachal-pradesh",
      +      "assam",
      +      "bihar",
      +      "central",
      +      "chandigarh",
      +      "chhattisgarh",
      +      "dadra-and-nagar-haveli-and-daman-and-diu",
      +      "dadra-nagar-haveli",
      +      "delhi",
      +      "goa",
      +      "gujarat",
      +      "haryana",
      +      "himachal-pradesh",
      +      "jammu-and-kashmir",
      +      "jammu-kashmir",
      +      "jharkhand",
      +      "karnataka",
      +      "kerala",
      +      "ladakh",
      +      "lakshadweep",
      +      "madhya-pradesh",
      +      "maharashtra",
      +      "manipur",
      +      "meghalaya",
      +      "mizoram",
      +      "nagaland",
      +      "odisha",
      +      "puducherry",
      +      "punjab",
      +      "rajasthan",
      +      "sikkim",
      +      "tamil-nadu",
      +      "telangana",
      +      "tripura",
      +      "uttar-pradesh",
      +      "uttarakhand",
      +      "west-bengal"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • removedInput schema / properties / state / enum
      Removed value: -[
      -  "andaman-and-nicobar-islands",
      -  "andaman-nicobar",
      -  "andhra-pradesh",
      -  "arunachal-pradesh",
      -  "assam",
      -  "bihar",
      -  "central",
      -  "chandigarh",
      -  "chhattisgarh",
      -  "dadra-and-nagar-haveli-and-daman-and-diu",
      -  "dadra-nagar-haveli",
      -  "delhi",
      -  "goa",
      -  "gujarat",
      -  "haryana",
      -  "himachal-pradesh",
      -  "jammu-and-kashmir",
      -  "jammu-kashmir",
      -  "jharkhand",
      -  "karnataka",
      -  "kerala",
      -  "ladakh",
      -  "lakshadweep",
      -  "madhya-pradesh",
      -  "maharashtra",
      -  "manipur",
      -  "meghalaya",
      -  "mizoram",
      -  "nagaland",
      -  "odisha",
      -  "puducherry",
      -  "punjab",
      -  "rajasthan",
      -  "sikkim",
      -  "tamil-nadu",
      -  "telangana",
      -  "tripura",
      -  "uttar-pradesh",
      -  "uttarakhand",
      -  "west-bengal"
      -]
    • changedInput schema / properties / status / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "enum": [
      +      "in_force",
      +      "repealed",
      +      "superseded",
      +      "spent"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • removedInput schema / properties / status / enum
      Removed value: -[
      -  "in_force",
      -  "repealed",
      -  "superseded",
      -  "spent"
      -]
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / department / description
      Previous value: -"Issuing body. Deliberately NOT an enumerated list: this field holds 943 distinct values and mixes clean regulator slugs (`sebi`, `rbi`, `moefcc`) with free-text state department names (`Law Department`). Read GET /acts/filters for the values with the most data behind them."New value: +"Accepts both regulator slugs such as `sebi` and `rbi` and free-text state department names such as `Law Department`. Values are not limited to a fixed enum or a uniform slug format."
  3. Changed17 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / category / description
      Previous value: -"Jurisdictional class."New value: +"Jurisdictional class of the instrument. `repealed` and `spent` are accepted for backward compatibility and resolve against the act's status instead. Values: `central`, `state`, `regulatory`, `repealed`, `spent`."
    • changedInput schema / properties / department / description
      Previous value: -"Issuing body. Free text rather than a list: 943 distinct values, mixing regulator slugs with state department names. See GET /acts/filters."New value: +"Issuing body. Deliberately NOT an enumerated list: this field holds 943 distinct values and mixes clean regulator slugs (`sebi`, `rbi`, `moefcc`) with free-text state department names (`Law Department`). Read GET /acts/filters for the values with the most data behind them."
    • changedInput schema / properties / page / description
      Previous value: -"Page number"New value: +"1-based page number."
    • addedInput schema / properties / page / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  1
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / pageSize / description
      Previous value: -"Results per page (1-100)"New value: +"Results per page (1-100)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / pageSize / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  50
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / search / description
      Previous value: -"Filter by title substring"New value: +"Keep only acts whose title contains this substring, matched case-insensitively. A title filter, not a search over the text: use POST /acts/search for that."
    • addedInput schema / properties / search / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  "income tax"
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / sort / description
      Previous value: -"Sort order. `popular` is DEPRECATED and behaves as `year_desc`: it ordered by a read counter held only in the retired store."New value: +"Sort order. `popular` is DEPRECATED and behaves as `year_desc`: it ordered by a read counter held only in the retired store. Values: `year_desc`, `year_asc`, `title_asc`, `title_desc`, `popular`."
    • changedInput schema / properties / state / description
      Previous value: -"Jurisdiction slug. `central` is a value here."New value: +"Jurisdiction slug. `central` is a value here, for Union legislation. Live counts per jurisdiction are on GET /acts/coverage."
    • changedInput schema / properties / status / description
      Previous value: -"The publisher's lifecycle status for the act."New value: +"The publisher's lifecycle status for the act. Their claim, not our verdict: see GET /acts/{actId}/status. Values: `in_force`, `repealed`, `superseded`, `spent`."
    • changedInput schema / properties / yearFrom / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "integer"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "maximum": 2100,
      +    "type": "integer"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / yearFrom / description
      Previous value: -"Minimum year (inclusive)"New value: +"Earliest year of enactment to include, inclusive. Matched against the publisher's own year field, which is occasionally corrupt, so there is no lower bound and a value below 1800 is a legitimate way to find those rows."
    • addedInput schema / properties / yearFrom / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  2015
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / yearTo / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "integer"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "maximum": 2100,
      +    "type": "integer"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / yearTo / description
      Previous value: -"Maximum year (inclusive)"New value: +"Latest year of enactment to include, inclusive."
    • addedInput schema / properties / yearTo / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  2024
      +]
  4. Changed14 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / category / description
      Previous value: -"Filter: central, state, regulatory, repealed, spent"New value: +"Jurisdictional class."
    • addedInput schema / properties / category / enum
      Added value: +[
      +  "central",
      +  "state",
      +  "regulatory",
      +  "repealed",
      +  "spent"
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / category / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  "central"
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / department / description
      Previous value: -"Filter by regulatory body (e.g. 'sebi', 'rbi')"New value: +"Issuing body. Free text rather than a list: 943 distinct values, mixing regulator slugs with state department names. See GET /acts/filters."
    • addedInput schema / properties / department / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  "sebi"
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / sort / description
      Previous value: -"Sort: year_desc, year_asc, title_asc, title_desc, popular"New value: +"Sort order. `popular` is DEPRECATED and behaves as `year_desc`: it ordered by a read counter held only in the retired store."
    • addedInput schema / properties / sort / enum
      Added value: +[
      +  "year_desc",
      +  "year_asc",
      +  "title_asc",
      +  "title_desc",
      +  "popular"
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / sort / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  "title_asc"
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / state / description
      Previous value: -"Filter by state slug (e.g. 'maharashtra', 'delhi')"New value: +"Jurisdiction slug. `central` is a value here."
    • addedInput schema / properties / state / enum
      Added value: +[
      +  "andaman-and-nicobar-islands",
      +  "andaman-nicobar",
      +  "andhra-pradesh",
      +  "arunachal-pradesh",
      +  "assam",
      +  "bihar",
      +  "central",
      +  "chandigarh",
      +  "chhattisgarh",
      +  "dadra-and-nagar-haveli-and-daman-and-diu",
      +  "dadra-nagar-haveli",
      +  "delhi",
      +  "goa",
      +  "gujarat",
      +  "haryana",
      +  "himachal-pradesh",
      +  "jammu-and-kashmir",
      +  "jammu-kashmir",
      +  "jharkhand",
      +  "karnataka",
      +  "kerala",
      +  "ladakh",
      +  "lakshadweep",
      +  "madhya-pradesh",
      +  "maharashtra",
      +  "manipur",
      +  "meghalaya",
      +  "mizoram",
      +  "nagaland",
      +  "odisha",
      +  "puducherry",
      +  "punjab",
      +  "rajasthan",
      +  "sikkim",
      +  "tamil-nadu",
      +  "telangana",
      +  "tripura",
      +  "uttar-pradesh",
      +  "uttarakhand",
      +  "west-bengal"
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / state / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  "maharashtra"
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / status / description
      Previous value: -"Filter: in_force, repealed, spent"New value: +"The publisher's lifecycle status for the act."
    • addedInput schema / properties / status / enum
      Added value: +[
      +  "in_force",
      +  "repealed",
      +  "superseded",
      +  "spent"
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / status / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  "repealed"
      +]
  5. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false and closed-world scope, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely useful context beyond them: the billing cost ('1 credit') and the pre-citation use case. It does not repeat annotation content, but it also doesn't add much else behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences plus a cost tag, with the browse-vs-search distinction front-loaded ahead of the use-case clause. No filler and nothing is buried.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained; the many filters are fully documented in the schema. Combined with clear usage routing and the credit disclosure, an agent has everything needed to call this correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the schema carries rich per-parameter notes (deprecated `popular`, corrupt year fields, `department` accepting mixed slug/free-text). The description only names the filter dimensions at a high level, adding little beyond what the schema already documents, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (browse/filter) and resource (enactments), and immediately scopes it against the sibling behavior: 'rather than searching their text.' It enumerates the filter axes (jurisdiction, regulator, year, status), so an agent can distinguish it from search_acts without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit when-to-use condition ('user wants to know WHAT exists in an area before asking what it says, or to confirm an Act's exact title before citing it') and an explicit contrast/exclusion against text search. The routing decision is fully determined by the description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.