Skip to main content
Glama

India Act Definitions

india_act_definitions
Read-only

The terms an act defines, and the provision that defines them.

Cost: 2 credits. Refunded when the act holds no extracted definitions, because the caller asked for definitions and did not get any.

⚠️ Coverage is thin and stated rather than implied: extracted defined terms exist for a minority of served acts. An empty answer here means we did not extract them, NOT that the act defines nothing. definitionSections is returned separately so you can read the defining provision directly even when no terms were extracted from it.

terms is paged with page + pageSize, because a long definitions clause can run to thousands of entries. definitionSections is short and is NOT paged, so it repeats in full on every page.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo1-based page number.
limitNoDEPRECATED alias for `pageSize`, kept working for clients written against the original shape. Send one or the other, not both.
act_idYesSection identifier, e.g. `USC_T42_C21_S1983` (Title 42, Chapter 21, Section 1983, written 42 U.S.C. 1983). Take it from a search result rather than assembling it: the title and section are derivable from a citation but the CHAPTER is not, so hand-built ids usually 404.
pageSizeNoRows per page (1-100). Defaults to 25.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / act_id / examples
      Previous value: -[
      -  "IND_state_17068"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "IND_central_2114"
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "maximum": 100,
      +      "minimum": 1,
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "DEPRECATED alias for `pageSize`, kept working for clients written against the original shape. Send one or the other, not both.",
      +  "examples": [
      +    25
      +  ]
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / page
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": 1,
      +  "description": "1-based page number.",
      +  "examples": [
      +    1
      +  ],
      +  "minimum": 1,
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / pageSize
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "maximum": 100,
      +      "minimum": 1,
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Rows per page (1-100). Defaults to 25.",
      +  "examples": [
      +    25
      +  ]
      +}
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description goes well beyond the readOnlyHint annotation by disclosing the 2-credit cost, the refund condition, the thin-coverage semantics, and the detailed paging behavior for `terms` versus `definitionSections`. It even clarifies that empty answers are about extraction coverage, not the act's content. This is rich behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense but every sentence earns its place: purpose, cost/refund, coverage caveat, and paging semantics. The critical warning is front-loaded before the paging details, and there is no fluff or repetition of schema content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that an output schema is present and the input schema is fully documented, the description covers all operational quirks an agent needs: cost, refunds, coverage limitations, interpretation of empty results, and pagination. Nothing essential is missing for invoking the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents all parameters with 100% coverage, so the baseline is 3. The description adds value by explaining why `page` and `pageSize` exist (a definitions clause can run to thousands of entries) and by clarifying that `definitionSections` is unpaged and repeats on every page. This goes beyond the schema's per-parameter descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The opening line, 'The terms an act defines, and the provision that defines them,' clearly identifies the resource and the response's two-part shape. It lacks an explicit verb like 'list' or 'retrieve' and does not call out sibling tools, but the resource is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides strong contextual guidance: it warns that coverage is thin, explains that an empty result means no extraction rather than no definitions, and tells the caller to consult `definitionSections` directly. It does not explicitly name alternative tools or state when not to use this tool, but the usage context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.