Skip to main content
Glama

get_recent_deployments

Read-onlyIdempotent

Recent completed SV deployments/releases from sv_operations_calendar (operation_type in deploy|release|upgrade), cross-referenced with github_releases when the title names a SemVer-looking tag. Canton-specific. Use to answer "what shipped on MainNet recently?".

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoHow many deployments to return, newest first. Default 10, max 50.
offsetNoSkip this many before returning, for paging past the limit. The response states the full count and echoes the offset used.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Previous value: -"Max rows (default 10)."New value: +"How many deployments to return, newest first. Default 10, max 50."
    • addedInput schema / properties / offset
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": 0,
      +  "description": "Skip this many before returning, for paging past the limit. The response states the full count and echoes the offset used.",
      +  "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      +  "minimum": 0,
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and non-destructive, but the description adds valuable behavioral detail beyond that: the data source (sv_operations_calendar), the filter on operation_type (deploy|release|upgrade), and the cross-referencing with github_releases for SemVer-like tags. This enriches the agent's understanding without contradicting annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences that front-load the core purpose, then add the use case. Every phrase carries meaning; no filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 params, no output schema), the description covers the essential context: data source, filtering logic, scope, and intended query. It is fully adequate for an agent to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and both 'limit' and 'offset' are thoroughly documented with defaults, ranges, and behavior. The description adds no direct parameter-level detail, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves recent completed SV deployments/releases from sv_operations_calendar, cross-referenced with github_releases. It specifies the scope (Canton-specific) and the exact use case ('what shipped on MainNet recently?'), distinguishing it from siblings like get_latest_release or get_upcoming_operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly gives a usage context: 'Use to answer "what shipped on MainNet recently?"'. While it doesn't name alternatives or exclusions, the use case is clear enough to guide the agent when to choose this over other deployment/release tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources